Re: Tigers handed ÂŁ40k fine : Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:43 am  

So who gets fined if there are homophobic chants heard at the Racecourse Ground wrexham ?

Re: Tigers handed ÂŁ40k fine : Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:51 am  

pyeman wrote:

None of those reasons.

You could negate your continually projected stupidity by actually naming them.

Re: Tigers handed ÂŁ40k fine : Mon Jul 05, 2010 12:13 pm  

Gurus_Beard wrote:

You could negate your continually projected stupidity by actually naming them.

Watching you make a fool of yourself is far more fun.

Re: Tigers handed ÂŁ40k fine : Mon Jul 05, 2010 12:58 pm  

pyeman wrote:

Watching you make a fool of yourself is far more fun.

And yet only you think this on the basis you have absolutely nothing of value to offer in response. On any subject. Nor have you supported your claim that the club are suddenly in receipt of any evidence. Excellent smoke screening.

It is quite clear to me your actual knowledge of the game, players and administrative processes is at best zero, irrespective of how long you may puport to have stood on the flaking terraces.

But again, I await your Working Mens Club-esque comedy gold or contunially failing sarcasm-ometer to kick in.

Re: Tigers handed ÂŁ40k fine : Mon Jul 05, 2010 1:13 pm  

Gurus_Beard wrote:

And yet only you think this on the basis you have absolutely nothing of value to offer in response. On any subject. Nor have you supported your claim that the club are suddenly in receipt of any evidence. Excellent smoke screening.

It is quite clear to me your actual knowledge of the game, players and administrative processes is at best zero, irrespective of how long you may puport to have stood on the flaking terraces.

But again, I await your Working Mens Club-esque comedy gold or contunially failing sarcasm-ometer to kick in.

Still failing to look like you have any intelligence or witt whatsoever i see.

Carry on we are all enjoying laughing at you.

Re: Tigers handed ÂŁ40k fine : Mon Jul 05, 2010 1:24 pm  

pyeman wrote:

Still failing to look like you have any intelligence or witt whatsoever i see.

Carry on we are all enjoying laughing at you.

Right on cue.

Re: Tigers handed ÂŁ40k fine : Mon Jul 05, 2010 3:12 pm  

marshman wrote:

I'm guessing you are an official within the RFL then The Chin's Back, since you have failed to see what the cas club have been doing BEFORE, during and after the incident. Take the time to go to the Tigers website and read the reasons why the Cas club feels hard done by with the severity of the fine. The RFL have given the reason that the Cas club failed to act upon the chants when according to the version Cas have written in their statement, i can't see much else they could have done apart from randomly throw a handgrenade in the direction of the chanting. After the Catalans incident last year, the club stepped up their efforts and then this incident gets them an astonishing ÂŁ40k fine even though the Cas club feel they are doing, and did all they could.

They didn't get a ÂŁ40k fine, they got a ÂŁ20k fine.

You can argue all you like about the ÂŁ20k fine, and in all honesty it was very harsh in relation to similar treatment of football sides.

But you can't argue about the other ÂŁ20k. There is no argument to be had. You accepted the suspended fine previously, and you have committed an offence again. You can't go back and say "well actually sir we thought you would never enforce it".

Re: Tigers handed ÂŁ40k fine : Mon Jul 05, 2010 3:18 pm  

Thought it was 40k with 20k suspended and the previous 20k brought forward, thus again 40k with 20k still suspended.....

Re: Tigers handed ÂŁ40k fine : Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:30 pm  

waltontiger wrote:

Thought it was 40k with 20k suspended and the previous 20k brought forward, thus again 40k with 20k still suspended.....

He ceryainly gotcha with that one mate

Re: Tigers handed ÂŁ40k fine : Tue Jul 06, 2010 12:29 pm  

pyeman wrote:

Still failing to look like you have any intelligence or witt whatsoever i see.

Carry on we are all enjoying laughing at you.

Actually most people are probably still perplexed at your original statement, and waiting for some more information to back it up.

Can you please enlighten us all as to what this "evidence" is that may have only just appeared?

Please can you explain how CCTV footage, knowledge of the chanting that occurred, and knowledge of the rules under the Respect agenda is still unsufficient for the club to have banned the individuals concerned, until after the fine?