Re: Newton Confirmed : Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:33 pm  

adam9641 wrote:

Who?

Not you.

: Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:33 pm  

As long as the deal to bring Drew is sensible....I would take him on a one year deal..

He can play 7 & 9, which would be cover for Sherwin when he is inevitably injured again next season and can rotate with Hudson... not sure if Netherton is out of contract this year but would not see him retained if Drew did come over.

Especially as we could move chase to 9 and McG to 6 if Hudson or Drew were injured.

This then leaves us next year to look for a suitable 7 and a back up 9.

: Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:38 pm  

Yet another topic where somebody/anybody needs to put up or shut up.

Re: Newton Confirmed : Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:43 pm  

vastman wrote:

Not you.

Realised that as we were saying the same thing.

People say prove it. How are people meant to do that? Put video footage of him meeting the Cas board or something

: Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:46 pm  

castigers222 wrote:

As long as the deal to bring Drew is sensible....I would take him on a one year deal..

He can play 7 & 9, which would be cover for Sherwin when he is inevitably injured again next season and can rotate with Hudson... not sure if Netherton is out of contract this year but would not see him retained if Drew did come over.

Especially as we could move chase to 9 and McG to 6 if Hudson or Drew were injured.

This then leaves us next year to look for a suitable 7 and a back up 9.

Netherton IMO gives us an extra dimenson, he is a lot quicker at 9 than Hudson, however Hudson has a better rugby brain, if we could somehow combine the two in to Netherton i think he would suitable to bring on rather than recruiting another player who is just looking for a pay packet

Re: Newton Confirmed : Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:47 pm  

adam9641 wrote:

Realised that as we were saying the same thing.

People say prove it. How are people meant to do that? Put video footage of him meeting the Cas board or something

Then don't keep banging on about it. If you are not prepared to say how you know then people will take it with a pinch of salt. If you can't name your 'source' you probably shouldn't be posting it in the first place.

Re: Newton Confirmed : Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:54 pm  

J.T wrote:

Then don't keep banging on about it. If you are not prepared to say how you know then people will take it with a pinch of salt. If you can't name your 'source' you probably shouldn't be posting it in the first place.

To be fair

That can be said for every poster who say's they're "in the know", Cas fan or otherwise

Re: Newton Confirmed : Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:57 pm  

casman2 wrote:

To be fair

That can be said for every poster who say's they're "in the know", Cas fan or otherwise

I would say the same to any poster. If you aren't prepared to say how you know how on earth can anyone believe what you say? Totally pointless.

Re: Newton Confirmed : Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:59 pm  

J.T wrote:

I would say the same to any poster. If you aren't prepared to say how you know how on earth can anyone believe what you say? Totally pointless.

I agree

And like i said, it can be said for many Cas fans

Re: Newton Confirmed : Tue Jul 21, 2009 1:02 pm  

casman2 wrote:

I agree

And like i said, it can be said for many Cas fans

cough Not naming any names like