: Tue Aug 25, 2009 2:49 pm  

Terry Monster wrote:

The club he's at when he's caught cheating has nothing to do with it though, it's not a clubs fault a player has decided to cheat the game.

or are you suggesting the Bulls encouraged Hudson to take performances enhancing drugs?

At the end of the day, we cut him when he was caught, you signed a known drug cheat, aswell as offering opportunity to an other

Well it depends if someone influenced him doesnt it? after all theres no evidence to suggest he ever did it at other clubs, so what made him want to do it in the first place i wonder

You had no coice but to 'cut him off' he was banned.

Cas have every right to give him a second chance though, after all he didnt do anything wrong when he played for us before (obviously better influences at cas than bradford), he has served his time according to the rules of the game.

By the way i was wondering if you could help me, after the solomona, harris and platt sagas which player are the bulls going to be signing illegally this year?

: Tue Aug 25, 2009 3:05 pm  

pyeman wrote:

Well it depends if someone influenced him doesnt it? after all theres no evidence to suggest he ever did it at other clubs, so what made him want to do it in the first place i wonder

You had no coice but to 'cut him off' he was banned.

Cas have every right to give him a second chance though, after all he didnt do anything wrong when he played for us before (obviously better influences at cas than bradford), he has served his time according to the rules of the game.

By the way i was wondering if you could help me, after the solomona, harris and platt sagas which player are the bulls going to be signing illegally this year?

Yeah somebody influenced him, himself. Why did he wan't to do it in the first place?....err, to enhance his performance....obviously, you know...performance enhancers.????

Why didn't we have a choice?, he was our employeee, he was banned from 2 years, we signed him for 3, but seen as though we don't want to be assosiated with drugs cheats, we terminated his contract, straight away.

Cas have every right to do what they wan't, and they showed that they are tolerant of drugs, and known drugs cheats when they signed Hudson and trialed Chambers.

Yeah I can help you, nobody.

: Tue Aug 25, 2009 3:17 pm  

Terry Monster wrote:

Yeah somebody influenced him, himself. Why did he wan't to do it in the first place?....err, to enhance his performance....obviously, you know...performance enhancers.????

Why didn't we have a choice?, he was our employeee, he was banned from 2 years, we signed him for 3, but seen as though we don't want to be assosiated with drugs cheats, we terminated his contract, straight away.

Cas have every right to do what they wan't, and they showed that they are tolerant of drugs, and known drugs cheats when they signed Hudson and trialed Chambers.

Yeah I can help you, nobody.

So as we've already established hudson only cheated when he was at bulls, so theres no problem with signing him because he doesnt cheat when he plays for other clubs, he only cheated as a bulls player. Strange that isnt it.

No players at cas take performance enhancing drugs, whilst bradford players do.

Yeah bulls were going to pay him for 3 years when he could only play for one, yeah thats some choice.

Good to know, the bulls arejust sticking to trying to sign blokes who attack women then.

: Tue Aug 25, 2009 3:34 pm  

pyeman wrote:

So as we've already established hudson only cheated when he was at bulls, so theres no problem with signing him because he doesnt cheat when he plays for other clubs, he only cheated as a bulls player. Strange that isnt it.

No players at cas take performance enhancing drugs, whilst bradford players do.

Yeah bulls were going to pay him for 3 years when he could only play for one, yeah thats some choice.

Good to know, the bulls arejust sticking to trying to sign blokes who attack women then.

All that's been established is that you have somehow got it into your numb skull that he was somehow encouraged or influenced to take performance enhancers by staff at Bulls. Ryan decided that, all by himself, it was nothing to do with the people at the club he was at, or indeed what club he was at.

No players at Cas taking performance enhancers?..well blow me away, but don't you continue to employ the man in question who is indeed a known taker of performance enhancing substances?

Adding further more to Castleford's assosiation with drug cheats and drug takers, you employ a man suspended in Australia for taking illegal, class a, recreational drugs, Mitchell Sargent.

Bulls were not going to pay him for 3 years when he couldn't play for 2, but they still had the choice wether to continue to employ him in some capacity withing the club, we choose not to, because we don't assosiate our selves with drug takers and performance cheats.

Who are Bulls trying to sign that attacks females?

: Tue Aug 25, 2009 3:50 pm  

Terry Monster wrote:

All that's been established is that you have somehow got it into your numb skull that he was somehow encouraged or influenced to take performance enhancers by staff at Bulls. Ryan decided that, all by himself, it was nothing to do with the people at the club he was at, or indeed what club he was at.

No players at Cas taking performance enhancers?..well blow me away, but don't you continue to employ the man in question who is indeed a known taker of performance enhancing substances?

Adding further more to Castleford's assosiation with drug cheats and drug takers, you employ a man suspended in Australia for taking illegal, class a, recreational drugs, Mitchell Sargent.

Bulls were not going to pay him for 3 years when he couldn't play for 2, but they still had the choice wether to continue to employ him in some capacity withing the club, we choose not to, because we don't assosiate our selves with drug takers and performance cheats.
Who are Bulls trying to sign that attacks females?

Dont start making up facts!!!

If you are banned, you can not have any involvment in the game during that period!!!

: Tue Aug 25, 2009 4:01 pm  

SimonBarrett wrote:

Dont start making up facts!!!

If you are banned, you can not have any involvment in the game during that period!!!

Says who?

: Tue Aug 25, 2009 4:15 pm  

Terry Monster wrote:

Says who?

The World Anti-Doping Authority, which Rugby League is a co operating member

: Tue Aug 25, 2009 4:20 pm  

SimonBarrett wrote:

The World Anti-Doping Authority, which Rugby League is a co operating member

Doesn't mean that they can't be employed by the club though.

: Tue Aug 25, 2009 4:23 pm  

Terry Monster wrote:

Doesn't mean that they can't be employed by the club though.

They cant have any involved in their sport during that time (cant train, cant coach etc etc)!!!! It is not hard to understand.......well l thought not anyway!

: Tue Aug 25, 2009 4:40 pm  

SimonBarrett wrote:

They cant have any involved in their sport during that time (cant train, cant coach etc etc)!!!! It is not hard to understand.......well l thought not anyway!

They may not be able to coach, train and play their sport during their suspension, but they can still be employed by clubs, but in a non playing, coaching capacity, ask Wigan and Gareth Hock.