Re: Wakefield Bulls : Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:41 pm  

Disco wrote:

So you don't want to answer my direct question then? Okay.. I take it just two season in lower leagues (and champions both times) is yet another point to Cas.

How far do you want to go back in history? We can go on about league titles and Challenge Cups, I know who has won more off them

I would rather stick to recent history it's more relevant to today's argument.

For the record Wakey have never been relegated from SL despite massive adversity over the last 10 years. Far worse adversity than Cas have had to endure.

I notice you conveniently ignored some of my points in a previous replay to you. tut tut tut!!

: Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:46 pm  

Let's hope it's Cas v Wakefield in the play-offs.
As I say, I thought you had your own forum to pursue your self-gratification? We really aren't interested.

Re: Wakefield Bulls : Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:49 pm  

deeHell wrote:

How far do you want to go back in history? We can go on about league titles and Challenge Cups, I know who has won more off them

I would rather stick to recent history it's more relevant to today's argument.

For the record Wakey have never been relegated from SL despite massive adversity over the last 10 years. Far worse adversity than Cas have had to endure.

I notice you conveniently ignored some of my points in a previous replay to you. tut tut tut!!

Do you include the lies about your ground to get in in the first place as an adversity?.

Re: Wakefield Bulls : Fri Sep 11, 2009 10:14 pm  

deeHell wrote:

I would rather stick to recent history

Of course you would. Tut tut tut.

Re: Wakefield Bulls : Fri Sep 11, 2009 10:32 pm  

casman2 wrote:

Korki was utter trash for us

No wishful thinking about it, i'd like to see Wakey do well, but with a crock like Morrison, a hot head like Newton and Jefferies who you've got rid of once and he went to a team that did worse than you i can't see you improving on this year

Not going to bite too much but how many games as the crock Brent Sherwin played this year?

Re: Wakefield Bulls : Fri Sep 11, 2009 10:35 pm  

BIGAL1 wrote:

Not going to bite too much

You're no fun any more.

Re: Wakefield Bulls : Fri Sep 11, 2009 10:37 pm  

Disco wrote:

You're no fun any more.

Mature is the word you may be looking for

Re: Wakefield Bulls : Fri Sep 11, 2009 10:51 pm  

deeHell wrote:

Ability to promote youth to first team, are you sure Castleford are superior than Wakey in that department, I would disagree. Consider we have just handed 7 full time contracts to out table topping academy team.

Stadium, well your is no better than ours.

I would hardly call that "many significant qualities" as you said.

Like I said before you fail to mentioned things like academy teams, League positions, woodern spoons and been in NL

But how many are first team regulars? Erm, Ferguson and who else?

Cas have Westerman, Shenton, Boyle, Owen, Huby who are all first team regulars or have first team experience at the top level.

Add to that Massey, Arundel and Thompson have all played top flight games.

And then add to that add Walker, Gledhill, Davies and Cording who all have full time professional contracts. I make that 12 players which exceeds your 7 players that have never played a game in SL or NL.

Also, add to that our past record of promoting players throughout the past decade and we more than out class Wakefield in that department.

Our stadium has three covered areas and only one full open end compared to your three-quarters open stadium. Ours is of much better standard than Belle Vue despite both being unfit for purpose.

Re: Wakefield Bulls : Fri Sep 11, 2009 10:51 pm  

BIGAL1 wrote:

Mature is the word you may be looking for

There's no place for that word on here mate.

: Fri Sep 11, 2009 11:14 pm  

pmsl and its supposed to be me that is slated for having pops at waky fans, think people ought to grow up. and stick to the thread topic this thread would have been cleaned up a long time ago on the wak forum......................................