Re: Tony Martin : Mon Oct 19, 2009 5:49 pm  

chissitt wrote:

:lol: It would be entertaining watching you and hopefully you would prove us all wrong

Ive nothing to prove, you trolls have got something to prove,

So again, prove to me this statement "The GMB have agreed to continue sponsoring your club on the proviso that Tonys contract be honoured"

Thats what i am saying,but you cant, if martin comes to cas or not is not the point.

Re: Tony Martin : Mon Oct 19, 2009 6:09 pm  

Speedy wrote:

So again, prove to me this statement "The GMB have agreed to continue sponsoring your club on the proviso that Tonys contract be honoured"

Thats what i am saying,but you cant, if martin comes to cas or not is not the point.

:roll:

Upton Cat made a remark. to some extent that remark has been backed up in a piece in the RL Express regarding his post, whether there is any truth in the matter it will come out in the fullness of time. With regards to the rest of your drivel I have neither the time or the inclinatation or indeed the knowledge to decipher your ramblings go and annoy somebody else.

Re: Tony Martin : Mon Oct 19, 2009 6:12 pm  

chissitt wrote:

go and annoy somebody else.

Funniest thing you ever posted chis.

: Mon Oct 19, 2009 6:18 pm  

One of the things that makes me laugh the most about this is the suggestion that GMB Union would blackmail a club into doing something in order to retain their sponsorship.

: Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:32 pm  

Legionited wrote:

One of the things that makes me laugh the most about this is the suggestion that GMB Union would blackmail a club into doing something in order to retain their sponsorship.

Yeh! It's not like trade unions ever stoop to that sort of tactic is it?

Re: Tony Martin : Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:39 pm  

chissitt wrote:

Upton Cat made a remark. to some extent that remark has been backed up in a piece in the RL Express regarding his post, whether there is any truth in the matter it will come out in the fullness of time. With regards to the rest of your drivel I have neither the time or the inclinatation or indeed the knowledge to decipher your ramblings go and annoy somebody else.

what 100% plonker you really are, you come on the cas board spouting sh!te and then have the gaul to say to me go and annoy somebody else. Tell you what stay on your own board and spout crap and we all on here will be happy,

: Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:46 pm  

Wollo-Wollo-Wollo-Wayoo wrote:

Yeh! It's not like trade unions ever stoop to that sort of tactic is it?

yes, next thing you know they will be fighting for the rights of one of their members to make an employer honour a contract they had entered into and then withdrawn, leaving him and his family high and dry. whatever next ?

: Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:52 pm  

MR BROWN wrote:

yes, next thing you know they will be fighting for the rights of one of their members to make an employer honour a contract they had entered into and then withdrawn, leaving him and his family high and dry. whatever next ?

And, of course, you can prove all of your allegations with names, dates and paper copies can you?

: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:01 pm  

Georgie Best on a Bloomer wrote:

And, of course, you can prove all of your allegations with names, dates and paper copies can you?

worse thing about this george is imo tony would have made a great addition to cas. i would have been happy to keep him at wakey but cas offered him a better deal. i don't blame him for taking it. best thing that could happen now imo is mcgoldrick to celtic, tony to cas, everybody happy.

: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:27 pm  

How many more of these "Failed Medical Experiments" do we have to put up with on here