Re: Cas v Crusaders : Thu Mar 25, 2010 1:48 pm  

Kirk Dixon simply must be put on the left wing, opposite Gareth Thomas, and that wing peppered with the ball at every opportunity.

My team:

McGoldrick, Ainscough, Evans, Shenton, Dixon, Chase, Sherwin, Jackson, Hudson, Huby, Jones, Snitch, Westerman.
Sargent, Higgins, Thompson, Cooper.

Re: Cas v Crusaders : Thu Mar 25, 2010 1:52 pm  

Thompson
Dixon
Shenton
Evans
Ainscough
McGoldrick
Chase
Jackson
Hudson
Huby
Jones
Cooper
Westerman

Sargent
Higgins
Tuson
Snitch

Re: Cas v Crusaders : Thu Mar 25, 2010 2:31 pm  

Riggins wrote:

Witt could be tricky. Obviously never seen Rangi play before

I have seen him on quite a few occasions. Just to check though is that the Rangi Chase who is in a team one place below that of Michael Witt's going into tomorrow night's game?

Obviously a much better player in a much better team, although the league apparently seems to have missed that fact.

Re: Cas v Crusaders : Thu Mar 25, 2010 2:56 pm  

crucrucrusaders wrote:

I have seen him on quite a few occasions. Just to check though is that the Rangi Chase who is in a team one place below that of Michael Witt's going into tomorrow night's game?

Obviously a much better player in a much better team, although the league apparently seems to have missed that fact.

Are you a Hudds supporter in disguise? You seem to be bearing all the trademarks of one Well done on your good start but best not to get too ahead of yourself, pride coming before a fall and all that

Re: Cas v Crusaders : Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:59 pm  

StuMain wrote:

Kirk Dixon simply must be put on the left wing, opposite Gareth Thomas, and that wing peppered with the ball at every opportunity.

That would be the sensible option Stu, although I feel that grubber kicks may be more effective as with rugby union they do a lot of kicking and catching so that would be playing into Thomas' hands IMO.

Re: Cas v Crusaders : Fri Mar 26, 2010 12:32 am  

How have Cas been playing guys? a 6 point start for Crusaders seems generous I fancy a wager on Cas surely they will beat the crusaders by more than that? Things can't be that bad guys can they??

Re: Cas v Crusaders : Fri Mar 26, 2010 12:46 am  

newgroundb4cas wrote:

How have Cas been playing guys? a 6 point start for Crusaders seems generous I fancy a wager on Cas surely they will beat the crusaders by more than that? Things can't be that bad guys can they??

If Matterson continues being clueless, Crusaders could win at a canter, if we end up with say Ainscough & Evans against Vince Mellars & Luke Dyer the high ball into the corner will be deadly at -6 I'd go for the Crusaders tbh.

Re: Cas v Crusaders : Fri Mar 26, 2010 9:51 am  

We've won 8 of 29 home league games since we were promoted in 2007, surely we're due another one....

Re: Cas v Crusaders : Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:12 am  

Optimism

Optimism

Re: Cas v Crusaders : Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:19 am  

StuMain wrote:

We've won 8 of 29 home league games since we were promoted in 2007, surely we're due another one....

That's something I was wondering. How many home games have we won under TM compared to how many away.

As far as i can remember we have always struggled at home under Matterson. Strange really!