: Sun May 24, 2009 7:47 am  

Roverswall wrote:

Was that the were you got a penalty for a shove by Fox?
If it is I suggest you go and look up the rules which causes a penatly try to be awarded as that isn't what happened on friday night.

From the angle I was at in the east stand it looked as though Fox ran the same angle as the Cas player and simply shouldered him (which is within the rules)

: Sun May 24, 2009 9:09 am  

From what I've been told the Ref was bad for both teams. It's become a classic Matterson after match rant now, blame the ref not the team. It's so predictable it's boring.

: Sun May 24, 2009 9:13 am  

therobins wrote:

Exactly. The game was over by that time (if it happened) and there was no consequence from it. Btw, you did very well to spot all the offsides from behind the posts. Did you have panoramic binoculars?

its the only way to watch at your place

: Sun May 24, 2009 9:13 am  

deeHell wrote:

From what I've been told the Ref was bad for both teams. It's become a classic Matterson after match rant now, blame the ref not the team. It's so predictable it's boring.

trollin again are we

: Sun May 24, 2009 10:13 am  

deeHell wrote:

From what I've been told the Ref was bad for both teams. It's become a classic Matterson after match rant now, blame the ref not the team. It's so predictable it's boring.

Haven't you got your home attendances to be discussing on your own forum?

: Sun May 24, 2009 11:23 am  

I didn't attend the game but from what's been said on here it doesn't sound like a penalty try should have been awarded.

As has been mentioned already by KR fans, unless the ref is very close to 100% certain that a try would have been awarded then he shouldn't award a penalty try. If Dixon didn't even have the ball in his hands I can't see how he could be certain that he would have scored hence it sounds like a penalty only should have been awarded - I presume one was?!

In the previous couple of games refs have made crucial decisions that have gone against us. Whilst the butterfly effect means you don't know whether Cas would have won had the ref given a different decision it's fair to say the decision didn't help in what were 2 very tight games.

As far as I recall, Morgan had a right old go at the ref in a game that KR were comprehensively beaten. I'd have thought that Matterson has at least as much right to complain in a tight game where one or two refs decisions could conceivably have made the difference...

: Sun May 24, 2009 11:30 am  

The RL authorities should throw the book at him, after every loss he spouts up about the ref, it's becoming a joke He's undermining the the respect of the Refs. Even after been awarded 15 penalties to 5 against Huddersfield he still went on one of his rants. It's getting that embarrassing it makes me cringe!

: Sun May 24, 2009 11:33 am  

deeHell wrote:

The RL authorities should throw the book at him, after every loss he spouts up about the ref, it's becoming a joke He's undermining the the respect of the Refs. Even after been awarded 15 penalties to 5 against Huddersfield he still went on one of his rants. It's getting that embarrassing it makes me cringe!

: Sun May 24, 2009 11:42 am  

deeHell wrote:

The RL authorities should throw the book at him, after every loss he spouts up about the ref, it's becoming a joke He's undermining the the respect of the Refs. Even after been awarded 15 penalties to 5 against Huddersfield he still went on one of his rants. It's getting that embarrassing it makes me cringe!

Poor attempt at trolling even for you....

Try harder..

: Sun May 24, 2009 12:12 pm  

Reenyrobin wrote:

all this complaining is making you sound like sore losers.

Hang on a minute, did'nt justin morgan moan moan moan 2/3 weeks back about the ref.......errr Mmm yeah i think he did.
All this moaning makes you/justin morgan sound like sore losers pfff