: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:32 pm  

Speedy wrote:

How many more of these "Failed Medical Experiments" do we have to put up with on here

It's alright, they'll be gone in a couple of years.

Re: Tony Martin : Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:47 pm  

Georgie Best on a Bloomer wrote:

So when Sainsbury's were your sponsor, did they stop the team shopping at other supermarkets we could mention?

I have no idea if this is the case just an enquiry.

The point is your club agreed a contract with Tony Martin not understanding his position Cas have tried to back out hence all the noises in the background your sponsor has links employemt rights figure it out yourself I only said it was possible if you read my post.

: Tue Oct 20, 2009 6:05 am  

Legionited wrote:

It's alright, they'll be gone in a couple of years.

wouldn't be so sure of that.

If nothing else YOU LOT should put as much effort as we are into ensuring WE survive. i.e get out and make sure your new ground gets built.
That's what were doing, and that's why by xmas (maybe a little later) we will have full planning permission for the stadium and outline for the complex. then who will be looking over the edge of SL?? won't be us.

Re: Tony Martin : Tue Oct 20, 2009 6:46 am  

REDWHITEANDBLUE wrote:

The point is your club agreed a contract with Tony Martin not understanding his position Cas have tried to back out hence all the noises in the background your sponsor has links employemt rights figure it out yourself I only said it was possible if you read my post.

So what was the point of saying it if you don't actually know anything?

: Tue Oct 20, 2009 6:47 am  

MR BROWN wrote:

worse thing about this george is imo tony would have made a great addition to cas. i would have been happy to keep him at wakey but cas offered him a better deal. i don't blame him for taking it. best thing that could happen now imo is mcgoldrick to celtic, tony to cas, everybody happy.

How does this reply to my post about you being able to prove anything? Just simply repeating unfounded claptrap doesn't convince anyone.

: Tue Oct 20, 2009 6:57 am  

pyeman wrote:

ah silly season.

Tis upon us

Maybe one or two trolls about but in all fairness there is two threads on this page about Wakey, of course its the Cas forum and you don't care about us but both threads posted to "attract"

Re: Tony Martin : Tue Oct 20, 2009 6:58 am  

Georgie Best on a Bloomer wrote:

So what was the point of saying it if you don't actually know anything?

Steady on, we'll have to shut the boards down if its "facts only"

[tb]

Re: Tony Martin : Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:08 am  

REDWHITEANDBLUE wrote:

The point is your club agreed a contract with Tony Martin not understanding his position Cas have tried to back out

is it? Apart from asertions on message boards backed up by zero evidence, there's no reason to assume Cas have entered into any employment contracs other than the ones they've announced

REDWHITEANDBLUE wrote:

hence all the noises in the background

what noises in the background? All I've seen is Wakey fans making claims on the internet. Which is evidence of nothing.

REDWHITEANDBLUE wrote:

your sponsor has links employemt rights figure it out yourself I only said it was possible if you read my post.

if - and this is a big if - Martin feels he has a grievance against the club, then the RLPPA/GMB could be execpected to represent him. That might or might not play a part in their decision whether to renew sponsorship. However, the idea that the club would let a potential sponsor dictate playing contracts remain, imnvho, bollix.

: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:24 am  

Sandal Wild Cat wrote:

wouldn't be so sure of that.

If nothing else YOU LOT should put as much effort as we are into ensuring WE survive. i.e get out and make sure your new ground gets built.
That's what were doing, and that's why by xmas (maybe a little later) we will have full planning permission for the stadium and outline for the complex. then who will be looking over the edge of SL?? won't be us.

Ignoring the fact that you keep changing your tune to suit, how do you know if a project is going to get planning permission before you apply? if all planning applications went through then you wouldnt have to apply, then of course how long will planning permision take even if it is approved, the feasability of the project, transport links etc all have to be studied, then of course you need full permission for the complex in order to get the supermarket money to fund etc.

Any credibility that you had as a poster is diminishing daily.

: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:28 am  

pyeman wrote:

Ignoring the fact that you keep changing your tune to suit, how do you know if a project is going to get planning permission before you apply? if all planning applications went through then you wouldnt have to apply, then of course how long will planning permision take even if it is approved, the feasability of the project, transport links etc all have to be studied, then of course you need full permission for the complex in order to get the supermarket money to fund etc.

Any credibility that you had as a poster is diminishing daily.

I was unaware that ZERO could diminish...