: Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:39 pm  

TURFEDOUT wrote:

Ive no intention of trading insults with him.

Im sure like most people on here Tigerman is a pretty decent chap away from the forum.

I accept his thoughts -- although i dont agree with them.

I must admit though to being slightly curious as to what caused this deep rooted hatred of Wakey.

LOL nothing caused it just cant stand em, its very much like some people you have never met before you take an instant dislike to even though you have not spoken to them or got to know them. Thats it cant stand em never have and never will, nothing to be curious about.

: Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:57 pm  

tigerman11 wrote:

ok but what about species, science, sufficient and ancient..what a t1t, just like your school reports and no doubt failed conquests of love it will always say must try harder.

I am suprised you havent tried to get on eggheads with the abundance of knowledge you seem to have at your disposal. As for a school report I doubt you would recognise one if it hit you on the head, I base that on the fact to get one you must attend school first. As for my love conquests to save you further embarassment lets just draw a veil on that eh

: Fri Nov 06, 2009 6:44 pm  

chissitt wrote:

I am suprised you havent tried to get on eggheads with the abundance of knowledge you seem to have at your disposal. As for a school report I doubt you would recognise one if it hit you on the head, I base that on the fact to get one you must attend school first. As for my love conquests to save you further embarassment lets just draw a veil on that eh

Now you and your school teacher have been proven wrong

: Fri Nov 06, 2009 6:52 pm  

tigerman1+1 wrote:

Ok but what about species, science, sufficient and ancient..what a t1t, just like your school reports and no doubt failed conquests of love it will always say must try harder. but if you are that desperate to score points you have to incorporate simple spelling mistakes so be it, but I assure you it will eventually bite you in the a55 but im sure you like that sort of thing!, as for the signatures, I find it intriguing that you could have the stupidity to try to get so many signatures when your actual club following is tiny in comparison just what sort of signal are you sending out.......apart from a desperate one of course.

Can we not ban tigerman1+1 on these grounds, sure personal insults are unacceptable here? I might even come on here more often if I didn't have to read the tripe he writes, it's almost so pathetic I'm starting to think he might be a Wakefield fan pretending to be a Cas fan to make us look bad?

: Fri Nov 06, 2009 7:44 pm  

no wonder this site gets over run with trolls, someone doesnt take their garbage and gives em sum back and your baying for blood, a bleeding heart liberal.

: Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:37 pm  

nottinghamtiger wrote:

Can we not ban tigerman1+1 on these grounds, sure personal insults are unacceptable here? I might even come on here more often if I didn't have to read the tripe he writes, it's almost so pathetic I'm starting to think he might be a Wakefield fan pretending to be a Cas fan to make us look bad?

i cant share your view on this matter, it seems to me that if people come on here and have views that are not seen as PC by the majority of the posters they just get slated, i dont hate wakefield as tigerman1+1 does but i would not shed any tears if the worst did happen to them, and as for banning him where was the mention of banning the wakey trolls when they have been coming on here gloating at the problems we have had over the lastst few months THERE WAS NONE, so in my opinion let people have there views, at the end of the day this is the cas board isnt it.

: Fri Nov 06, 2009 9:06 pm  

tigerman1 wrote:

i cant share your view on this matter, it seems to me that if people come on here and have views that are not seen as PC by the majority of the posters they just get slated, i dont hate wakefield as tigerman1+1 does but i would not shed any tears if the worst did happen to them, and as for banning him where was the mention of banning the wakey trolls when they have been coming on here gloating at the problems we have had over the lastst few months THERE WAS NONE, so in my opinion let people have there views, at the end of the day this is the cas board isnt it.

I see your point, and think message boards are a place for people to express their views (however strange). I agree other fans coming and 'trolling' is annoying and frustrating.
However, I think tigerman1+1 crosses the line by throwing around personal insults that have no significance to the issue being discussed and debated, and that certainly wouldn't be acceptable or condoned if repeated in the real world!

: Fri Nov 06, 2009 9:58 pm  

nottinghamtiger wrote:

I see your point, and think message boards are a place for people to express their views (however strange). I agree other fans coming and 'trolling' is annoying and frustrating.
However, I think tigerman1+1 crosses the line by throwing around personal insults that have no significance to the issue being discussed and debated, and that certainly wouldn't be acceptable or condoned if repeated in the real world!

at the end of the day this certainly isnt the real world, if it were cas would have a playing squad of about 400 and as for the insults most of them seem to be aimed at chissit and you cant say that he doesnt ask for most of them, but in all seriousness i think wakey are in a massive hole, we had to stump up 20k to the RL and that seems to have dented our player recruitment they have got to find about 185k in 84 days, big big problems in my eyes yet some of the wakey fans seem to be making light of the situation on there own board thinking that the club will find the money with no problems at all, i just cant see this happening and i see very troubled times ahead for the pussycats

: Fri Nov 06, 2009 9:58 pm  

Just to get this back on topic, you might want to read this : - http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2009/apr/07/super-league-tax-clampdown It's why Wakefield are in a mess with the tax man as far as i can tell and why other clubs could be in the same mess. Read the part almost at the bottom.

Just to get this back on topic, you might want to read this : - http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2009/apr/07/super-league-tax-clampdown It's why Wakefield are in a mess with the tax man as far as i can tell and why other clubs could be in the same mess. Read the part almost at the bottom.

: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:16 pm  

12noon wrote: Just to get this back on topic, you might want to read this : - http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2009/apr/07/super-league-tax-clampdown It's why Wakefield are in a mess with the tax man as far as i can tell and why other clubs could be in the same mes. i remember reading this article at the time, so is this deffinatly the reason wakey have been pulled ?, if this is the case i think we could see st helens warrington huddersfield wigan and bradford being in hot water too, infact it could probably be every club in the league except cas as we stopped paying out big wages in about 1995

12noon wrote: Just to get this back on topic, you might want to read this : - http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2009/apr/07/super-league-tax-clampdown It's why Wakefield are in a mess with the tax man as far as i can tell and why other clubs could be in the same mes. i remember reading this article at the time, so is this deffinatly the reason wakey have been pulled ?, if this is the case i think we could see st helens warrington huddersfield wigan and bradford being in hot water too, infact it could probably be every club in the league except cas as we stopped paying out big wages in about 1995