Re: Wakey and the 'Sharing' option : Thu Mar 17, 2011 10:00 am
dickie mint wrote:
If you care to look the thread was started by a Cas fan and then discussed by Cas fans, which being their board they have every right to, but seeing as you are discussing Wakey and the merits of a groundshare would you deny Wakey fans the right of reply?
Sounds like the way your mob run your board, so we should be the same - make the slightest comment you lot don't like and you sulk and call anyone you don't agree with a troll
Added to the fact from your very first comment in this thread was designed to derail and cause bother, I'd say no, you don't have the right to reply
Therailwayendisuponus. wrote:
I think RW has been a bit clever here. The housing company obviously know we are desperate for the money, and why. So they have tried to nick WR. I would imagine RW has said, balls to em we'll sell it to someone else then. We are prepared to wait. Rightly so IMO. I know this is merely conjecture, but reading between the lines that's what I think. If they want the land they will pay up.
It's either that or someone else has shown an interest offering more money.