: Sun May 24, 2009 1:07 pm  

poppys mum wrote:

Hang on a minute, did'nt justin morgan moan moan moan 2/3 weeks back about the ref.......errr Mmm yeah i think he did.
All this moaning makes you/justin morgan sound like sore losers pfff

Yes he did, but how do I sound like a sore loser? Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't this the third time TM has had a pop at the refs? Not saying he is not entitled to his opinions, as most of the refs leave a lot to be desired.

IMO I put forward a balanced opinion of the matter with out being detrimental to the Cas team, who I rate highly. Then you come along and spit your dummy out with a childish rant, complete with ultra "mature" smiley.

: Sun May 24, 2009 1:14 pm  

For those that didn't go, (Wakey trolls included) there were two SEPARATE incidents that we are all talking about. Some are getting confused and if you watch the TM interview on Tiger TV even he and the interviewer get things mixed up.

There was an incident in the first half where a kick was put through along the ground, Dixon ran through to score but was taken out by a Hull KR player, preventing him getting to the ball to ground it. A penalty was awarded to Cas for this offense. Some people claim this should have been a penalty try, others say it shouldn't have even been a penalty because it was shoulder to shoulder.

The second incident was in the second half. Cas were attacking and put a high kick out wide to the wing for Evans and Dixon. As the ball was in the air, Dixon came across and was seemingly about to catch the ball. Before he could jump up a Hull KR player ran into him knocking him out of the way and Dixon got nowhere near the ball. THIS is the incident TM feels hard done by, because not only did Cas not get a penalty, Hull KR then got the ball, two sets later were awarded a penalty and within seconds had scored the killer try.

As i say, TM and the interviewer get this mixed up on Tiger TV. TM is asked about the second incident and TM explains we should have had the penalty and goes on to say we have had some dodgy calls over the last three games. The interviewer asks TM his thoughts on the "penalty try" incident but TM still thinks he's talking about the second incident and not the first one.

: Sun May 24, 2009 2:55 pm  

A lot of robins are mentioning the head high tackle from sherwin which gave KR their first penalty...even the most one eyed, most biased, one sided, methadone taking, fish smelling, hull commentator said that the player (wellham?) slipped and ducked into the tackle. Not to mention the other various incidents that bemused the radio humberside commentators which went in favour of KR

: Sun May 24, 2009 4:03 pm  

rover49 wrote:

You keep going on about the Dixon incident, the player who decked Welham should have walked, which DEFINATELY would have changed the game.

You see there I disagree (sorry). From the RM stand it was a case of Welham ducking in as much as the cas player high shoting. Penalty enough for me.

: Sun May 24, 2009 9:32 pm  

irish tiger wrote:

A lot of robins are mentioning the head high tackle from sherwin which gave KR their first penalty...even the most one eyed, most biased, one sided, methadone taking, fish smelling, hull commentator said that the player (wellham?) slipped and ducked into the tackle. Not to mention the other various incidents that bemused the radio humberside commentators which went in favour of KR

You lot know how to spit a dummy don't you

: Mon May 25, 2009 9:01 am  

Reenyrobin wrote:

You lot know how to spit a dummy don't you

well 3 games in a row gettin the sh*t end of the stick!

: Tue May 26, 2009 3:13 am  

OH for petes sake get a life all of ya, Moaning at refs, should be football coaches not RL.

We all feel we get the poop end of the stick from refs, We were hammered in penalty count against Stains at start of season but never heard Nathan Brown come out and start whinging.

It evens itself out over the season and damn sure you and TM, JM or BN won't be on here spouting when a decision goes in your favour?

Get over it cos it won't change

: Tue May 26, 2009 8:32 am  

FLYINGPROP wrote:

OH for petes sake get a life all of ya, Moaning at refs, should be football coaches not RL.

We all feel we get the poop end of the stick from refs, We were hammered in penalty count against Stains at start of season but never heard Nathan Brown come out and start whinging.

It evens itself out over the season and damn sure you and TM, JM or BN won't be on here spouting when a decision goes in your favour?

Get over it cos it won't change

This is the Cas fans forum, so if we wish to moan about getting a rough deal from Refs, then this is the place to do it, we have certainly been at the wrong end of some bad decisions this last few weeks, maybe on Sunday for a change we will be at the right end of such decisions.
The point being made is that taking someone out in the air, as happened to Dixon in two consecutive matches now, isn't open to interpretation, it's clearly against the laws of the game and should always result in a penalty, or even a penalty try, should the circumstances warrant that.
I believe we (Cas) are not well versed enough in conning refs, but believe that at least half the teams in Superleague have the ability to lie on and not be penalised, steal the ball in a two man tackle and not be penalised, take a man out in the air and not be penalised and make a high shot and not be penalised. The Giants are one of the teams who are extremely good in most of these areas, I hope the ref on Sunday is aware of and able to spot such misdemeanors.

: Tue May 26, 2009 10:14 am  

Whoever thinks Sherwin should have walked needs to seriously watch the replay, The guys head was at waist height when he connected and there was no swinging arm, Sherwin is not an agressive HB, He wouldnt try and take someone out.

As for the incidents i spoke to Gareth Hewer who said it was his touchie who gave the penalty for dixon, And a penalty was harsh on Hull KR as it was just a barge, And there was no claim for a penalty try as there was cover coming across.

As for Dixon getting taken out AGAIN, He said he only saw 3 players jumped and he asked the touchie again who said there was no infringement so he played on, He didnt sound too sure of his decision when i questioned him after seeing the replay - So i would guess that maybe we had great shouts for a Penalty there

: Tue May 26, 2009 2:31 pm  

FLYINGPROP wrote:

OH for petes sake get a life all of ya, Moaning at refs, should be football coaches not RL.

We all feel we get the poop end of the stick from refs, We were hammered in penalty count against Stains at start of season but never heard Nathan Brown come out and start whinging.

It evens itself out over the season and damn sure you and TM, JM or BN won't be on here spouting when a decision goes in your favour?

Get over it cos it won't change

There's a reason why Huddersfield get hammered in the penalty count though