: Wed Jul 22, 2009 9:12 pm  

Speaking from a neutrals point of view, I certainly wouldnt put Wheldon Road in the same bracket as BV, CP, BF, or even odsal. Good old fashioned rl ground imo.

: Wed Jul 22, 2009 9:32 pm  

tb wrote:

Dammed if they keep things secret. Damned if they conduct business in an open and transparent manner. This is no different to the 2005 promotion criteria inspections and demands for improvements, which were fully public.

As I said earlier: "No surprises there". Generally, it's a nothing story.

Why did they tell you to find somewhere to put more seats , but you said that you didn't have anywhere , so they said " OK " never mind we'll change the rules for you

: Wed Jul 22, 2009 10:51 pm  

super_fc wrote:

Speaking from a neutrals point of view, I certainly wouldnt put Wheldon Road in the same bracket as BV, CP, BF, or even odsal. Good old fashioned rl ground imo.

groveler

: Wed Jul 22, 2009 11:28 pm  

Dead Man Walking wrote:

Better burgers than at Salford ?

Yea I reckon so. Infact I'd put Londons in second place. Has anyone ever tried the Catalan burgers? They are the only one I haven't had.

: Thu Jul 23, 2009 1:09 am  

Le Tigres wrote:

It's as if we haven't know this for the past 5 years.

then why have;nt ur board done anything about it ????? any 1 explain??????

: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:09 am  

redandy wrote:

then why have;nt ur board done anything about it ????? any 1 explain??????

cnt fink of ny reason tbh m8

: Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:20 am  

who needs flankers? wrote:

Yea I reckon so. Infact I'd put Londons in second place. Has anyone ever tried the Catalan burgers? They are the only one I haven't had.

yeah, had one this year. Nothin to right home about, tasted of frog for some reason

: Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:39 am  

Tiger_69 wrote:

yeah, had one this year. Nothin to right home about, tasted of frog for some reason

So a bit like chicken

: Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:42 am  

Starbug wrote:

So a bit like chicken

little bit

: Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:21 am  

rovers wrote:

Unbelievable, try building a new stadium with no sky money not the 13 million or so super league teams have had, the thing is some championship teams HAVE managed it

Sky money is pretty irrelevent to building a stadium, even if a team who had been in sl since day one had saved every penny of sky money they would still be hard pressed to afford a sl standard stadium with it. Whats more sky money is the primary means most clubs use to fund there squad so clubs have to spend most of it on players, otherwise (until last year) you got relegated and therefore lost access to said sky money. As for the teams in the nls that have built new stadia they should be applauded, but how many of them did it without local council funds? leigh didnt, widnes didnt, fax have had there stadia finished off by the council etc if wakey council were as helpfully as the council in these places then both us and wakey would probabley already be in shiny new stadia.