Re: Wakefield Bulls : Sun Sep 13, 2009 11:49 pm  

JINJER wrote:

Too bloody right,i've nothing to be afraid of,it's they who are incompetent not me cocker,if you think they handled the Drew/Martin saga with dignity then good on ya!!

TBH. I'm big enough to admit that I've no clue about what happened, and I reserve judgement on people until I actually know the facts about them.

Obviously, as you know the exact details and you can therefore be in the unenviable position where you're able to make that decision, I would now like you to publish names, dates, places and contractual information so that everyone on here can then make up their mind.

As the situation is allegedly going to be the subject of legal proceedings, any amount of verifiable information will help in the final outcome of the hearings and as such will be invaluable in determining whether there was any wrongdoing.

So, over to you...

Re: Wakefield Bulls : Mon Sep 14, 2009 6:14 am  

Georgie Best on a Bloomer wrote:

TBH. I'm big enough to admit that I've no clue about what happened, and I reserve judgement on people until I actually know the facts about them.

Obviously, as you know the exact details and you can therefore be in the unenviable position where you're able to make that decision, I would now like you to publish names, dates, places and contractual information so that everyone on here can then make up their mind.

As the situation is allegedly going to be the subject of legal proceedings, any amount of verifiable information will help in the final outcome of the hearings and as such will be invaluable in determining whether there was any wrongdoing.

So, over to you...

Thats sorted him, but there will be some crap excuse coming as to why he cant post the information

Re: Wakefield Bulls : Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:46 am  

Speedy wrote:

Thats sorted him, but there will be some crap excuse coming as to why he cant post the information

Its called being responsible I would assume but then what would you know its suprising you havent insulted him and asked for the thread to be locked

Re: Wakefield Bulls : Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:27 am  

chissitt wrote:

Its called being responsible I would assume but then what would you know its suprising you havent insulted him and asked for the thread to be locked

We'd already agreed that I'd do it for him. Youre a to**er. Can we have this thread locked please

Happy now

Re: Wakefield Bulls : Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:45 pm  

westyorkylad wrote:

We'd already agreed that I'd do it for him. Youre a to**er. Can we have this thread locked please

Happy now

Re: Wakefield Bulls : Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:49 pm  

chissitt wrote:

Its called being responsible I would assume but then what would you know its suprising you havent insulted him and asked for the thread to be locked

Maybe we should all start posting slurs about all and sundry on here, and then start saying we're being "responsible" by not backing them up.

Re: Wakefield Bulls : Mon Sep 14, 2009 6:01 pm  

Georgie Best on a Bloomer wrote:

Maybe we should all start posting slurs about all and sundry on here, and then start saying we're being "responsible" by not backing them up.

Perhaps he could/could not back them up who cares the point is your own mod warned everybody off the subject because of the legal ramifications involved, thats why he has presumably left it alone, dont you think that it might be better if you did the same.

Re: Wakefield Bulls : Mon Sep 14, 2009 6:32 pm  

chissitt wrote:

Perhaps he could/could not back them up who cares the point is your own mod warned everybody off the subject because of the legal ramifications involved, thats why he has presumably left it alone, dont you think that it might be better if you did the same.

And this was exactly where after his "incompetent" post (6.08pm Sunday)?.

This mod would be who: you, me, speedy or westyorkylad?

: Mon Sep 14, 2009 6:32 pm  

Fully wrote: Attendances
Ability to promote youth to first team
Fans/Fanbase
Stadium [on current basis]

and who's just brought in 7 academy players. DOH!

Re: Wakefield Bulls : Mon Sep 14, 2009 7:35 pm  

Georgie Best on a Bloomer wrote:

TBH. I'm big enough to admit that I've no clue about what happened, and I reserve judgement on people until I actually know the facts about them.

Obviously, as you know the exact details and you can therefore be in the unenviable position where you're able to make that decision, I would now like you to publish names, dates, places and contractual information so that everyone on here can then make up their mind.

As the situation is allegedly going to be the subject of legal proceedings, any amount of verifiable information will help in the final outcome of the hearings and as such will be invaluable in determining whether there was any wrongdoing.

So, over to you...