Re: 19 for huddersfield, no sherwin. : Fri Apr 09, 2010 4:00 pm  

Because they were both out boozing Tuesday night. Fools.

Re: 19 for huddersfield, no sherwin. : Fri Apr 09, 2010 4:01 pm  

1 mcgoldrick
2 ainscough
3 shenton
4 jones
5 wainwright
6 thompson
7 netherton
8 sarge
9 hudson
10 jackson
11huby
12 clayton
13 tuson

14 holmes
15 walker
16higgins
17 cooper

Is about the best i can think of, going to into a gmae with only 5 back, bugger me.

Re: 19 for huddersfield, no sherwin. : Fri Apr 09, 2010 4:06 pm  

Towns88 wrote:

Because they were both out boozing Tuesday night. Fools.

Silly buggers.

Re: 19 for huddersfield, no sherwin. : Fri Apr 09, 2010 4:30 pm  

As if we hadn't got enough problems, they've let everyone down badly, but well done to TM for taking the action he has!

Thompson

Ainscough
Shenton
Clayton
Wainwright

Tuson
McGoldrick

Cooper
Hudson
Jackson
Huby
Jones
Davies

Netherton
Sargeant
Higgins
Walker

Re: 19 for huddersfield, no sherwin. : Fri Apr 09, 2010 4:33 pm  

Thompson

Wainwright
Shenton
Tuson
Ainscough

McGoldrick
Netherton

Sargent
Hudson
Jackson
Snitch
Walker
Jones

Bench: Cooper, Higgins, Huby, Holmes.

Re: 19 for huddersfield, no sherwin. : Fri Apr 09, 2010 5:04 pm  

We will get battered off the park tonight

I'm feeling another 72-4 esque score a la Saints a few seasons ago

Chase and Westerman should hang their heads in shame (whether they were stood down for drinking or not). I am really becoming vexed off with the crap that is coming out of the club lately. It's all negative, nothing positive. Matterson tries to put a spin of "we weren't far off" yes Terry we were, we were very poor in the second half against Saints and it is not going to get any better with players being injured or dropped.

The message needs getting out to the players. They either play because they want to or sod off somewhere else and stop wasting our time and money

Re: 19 for huddersfield, no sherwin. : Fri Apr 09, 2010 5:17 pm  

I cant recall us putting out a weaker side in sl. Only positive is that holmes and walker get there chance.

Re: 19 for huddersfield, no sherwin. : Fri Apr 09, 2010 6:04 pm  

Quite easily the worst team on paper in Superleague ive seen in about a decade!!

Harlequins would tonk us!!

Whatever theyve done, i cant see how resting them (Rangi + Joe) does anyone any favour's??

Just slap them with a big fine, that would hurt me more than getting dropped for a game!!

Cant see with all the latest media Cas has been getting, no stadium, no team, how were going to be allowed a Franchise next time around...... They goons at Red Hall are going to at least bring 2 up next time, id say were a definate to not be allowed to stay in SL.

Oh well, idk too much, id much prefer us to win in NL1 than getting battered/be the laughing stock of SL.

Re: 19 for huddersfield, no sherwin. : Fri Apr 09, 2010 6:14 pm  

Got to admire Matterson sticking to his disciplinary principals even if it will cost him his job

Re: 19 for huddersfield, no sherwin. : Fri Apr 09, 2010 7:16 pm  

No wonder Chase joined that "Change at Cas" facebook group!