: Sat Dec 05, 2009 8:05 pm  

tigerbaz wrote:

Pmsl

I am still waiting for a reply myself, or are you too embarassed

: Sat Dec 05, 2009 8:07 pm  

tigerman1+1 wrote:

Cheers dickie its nice to be appreciated

yer a good lad deep down, just a bit misunderstood thats all

: Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:15 pm  

dickie mint wrote: Thanks for that speedy, top marks for research. I'm not sure why you typed it in twice but I am sure you have your reasons. I fail to see what that has to do with me and my insistance of tigerbaz offering proof of the statement he made against the good name of SWAG. I personally have not nor will I get involved in the comings and goings of WMDC, but the offer still stands to tigerbaz to offer proof or resign gracefully from his irresponsible statement hth. Ok but what was all this about then ? Any chance of remembering this one Target Councillors But hey this isnt political is it ? TRB wrote: "I aint given up - and yes, a change in control would mean there would be opportunities for agreements / alliances and DEALS. They may not be able to afford to build us a stadium - but as has already been mentioned re Trinity and shown at Glasshoughton, it is not necessary to pile in the multi-millions to make something happen. If we're not getting the right answers from anyone - we'll stand ourselves. Daft thing is you have to live in the area to question the councillor - but you don't have to live there to be one??? " and Prince Buster wrote: The solution to our plight has got to be political no matter what you think. The club can only do so much so we need some council involvement somewhere. At the end of the day I think that every councillor in the whole of WMDC has the same number one priority and that is to retain their seat, everything else is secondary. The only weapon we have is public opinion. If councillors start to believe that this issue could cost them their seats they will become focused. Their leadership will also become focused because their overall majority is 1. Some people have posted (especially from other clubs) that the council did us a favour by keeping quite when Thornes looked in doubt. I don't believe they did that for us, they did that to save their hides at the last election. If this had have come out a couple of weeks before the May election I am sure it would have cost them another seat somewhere around wakefield. So we must keep the political pressure on them and let them worry about their seats and their fate at the next election. Also at the same time we must be reasonable and try and work with them and make sure it is also at the back of their minds it is also better for them to work with us than against us.

dickie mint wrote: Thanks for that speedy, top marks for research. I'm not sure why you typed it in twice but I am sure you have your reasons. I fail to see what that has to do with me and my insistance of tigerbaz offering proof of the statement he made against the good name of SWAG. I personally have not nor will I get involved in the comings and goings of WMDC, but the offer still stands to tigerbaz to offer proof or resign gracefully from his irresponsible statement hth. Ok but what was all this about then ? Any chance of remembering this one Target Councillors But hey this isnt political is it ? TRB wrote: "I aint given up - and yes, a change in control would mean there would be opportunities for agreements / alliances and DEALS. They may not be able to afford to build us a stadium - but as has already been mentioned re Trinity and shown at Glasshoughton, it is not necessary to pile in the multi-millions to make something happen. If we're not getting the right answers from anyone - we'll stand ourselves. Daft thing is you have to live in the area to question the councillor - but you don't have to live there to be one??? " and Prince Buster wrote: The solution to our plight has got to be political no matter what you think. The club can only do so much so we need some council involvement somewhere. At the end of the day I think that every councillor in the whole of WMDC has the same number one priority and that is to retain their seat, everything else is secondary. The only weapon we have is public opinion. If councillors start to believe that this issue could cost them their seats they will become focused. Their leadership will also become focused because their overall majority is 1. Some people have posted (especially from other clubs) that the council did us a favour by keeping quite when Thornes looked in doubt. I don't believe they did that for us, they did that to save their hides at the last election. If this had have come out a couple of weeks before the May election I am sure it would have cost them another seat somewhere around wakefield. So we must keep the political pressure on them and let them worry about their seats and their fate at the next election. Also at the same time we must be reasonable and try and work with them and make sure it is also at the back of their minds it is also better for them to work with us than against us.

: Sun Dec 06, 2009 1:22 am  

tigerbaz wrote:

Pmsl

Is that your idea of graceful?
Good reply mate!

: Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:15 am  

dickie mint wrote:

:lol: yer a good lad deep down, just a bit misunderstood thats all

Buga finally someone's sussed me out

: Sun Dec 06, 2009 10:28 am  

Speedy wrote: Ok but what was all this about then ? Any chance of remembering this one Target Councillors But hey this isnt political is it ? and Speedy old cock we seem to have a serious breakdown in communication here, either that or you have one leg shorter than the other because we seem to be going round in circles. To coin a well used phrase what part of I personally have not nor will I get involved in the comings and goings of WMDC do you not understand.Once again though I applaud you for the effort in research, it would seem that you might just have found your niche in life, either that or you have too much time on your hands. Either way it is lost on me, so if I might be so bold I would suggest you save your efforts' for those that deserve it, and to also refer them to the relevent posters' My response was to tigerbaz and his allegation against SWAG so if you are acting as his agent then might I suggest you ask him to come out of hiding and explain himself thats if he wants people to take his remarks seriouly in the future. Regards

Speedy wrote: Ok but what was all this about then ? Any chance of remembering this one Target Councillors But hey this isnt political is it ? and Speedy old cock we seem to have a serious breakdown in communication here, either that or you have one leg shorter than the other because we seem to be going round in circles. To coin a well used phrase what part of I personally have not nor will I get involved in the comings and goings of WMDC do you not understand.Once again though I applaud you for the effort in research, it would seem that you might just have found your niche in life, either that or you have too much time on your hands. Either way it is lost on me, so if I might be so bold I would suggest you save your efforts' for those that deserve it, and to also refer them to the relevent posters' My response was to tigerbaz and his allegation against SWAG so if you are acting as his agent then might I suggest you ask him to come out of hiding and explain himself thats if he wants people to take his remarks seriouly in the future. Regards

: Sun Dec 06, 2009 4:04 pm  

Christ, why have the wakey fans got their knickers in such a twist about something that may, or may not have been said last year?

Let it go....you (apparently) have good news ahead,so enjoy the moment.

We are in danger of getting as bad as F.C / K.R fans

: Sun Dec 06, 2009 4:15 pm  

duke street 10 wrote:

Christ, why have the wakey fans got their knickers in such a twist about something that may, or may not have been said last year?

Let it go....you (apparently) have good news ahead,so enjoy the moment.

We are in danger of getting as bad as F.C / K.R fans

I doubt we'll ever reach that level, too many sensible heads on both sides for that to happen.

But i agree its dragging on a bit.

: Sun Dec 06, 2009 5:26 pm  

Speedy wrote:

see you caught two in one go PMSL

I got one as well


Im the one with the small bellie

: Sun Dec 06, 2009 5:40 pm  

dickie mint wrote:

Speedy old cock we seem to have a serious breakdown in communication here, either that or you have one leg shorter than the other because we seem to be going round in circles. To coin a well used phrase what part of I personally have not nor will I get involved in the comings and goings of WMDC do you not understand.Once again though I applaud you for the effort in research, it would seem that you might just have found your niche in life, either that or you have too much time on your hands. Either way it is lost on me, so if I might be so bold I would suggest you save your efforts' for those that deserve it, and to also refer them to the relevent posters' My response was to tigerbaz and his allegation against SWAG so if you are acting as his agent then might I suggest you ask him to come out of hiding and explain himself thats if he wants people to take his remarks seriouly in the future. Regards

Richard, the original statement started back at the begining by one of your own "DeeHill" where he asked where SWAG had been involved in trying to get rid of councilors policicaly. You then dived in to back him up. I was only showing referances to statements by people that are a part of SWAG are they not. To be honest i dont give two $hits as to what wake do or there supporters do, The easy solution to this is dont come on here and spout $hite . BTW if you know anything about forums and how they run, its quite easy to scan them for what you want, it took me about five minutes to grab the info. But this might be hard for a young cock like you eh