Re: Wakey and the 'Sharing' option : Sat Mar 19, 2011 6:37 pm  

You've got a lot of growing up to do.

Re: Wakey and the 'Sharing' option : Sat Mar 19, 2011 7:29 pm  

G.Price Fan Club wrote:

deeHell: Why ruin another stadium thread?

Our time for back biting is done, save it for the field.

Off the field we need to work together.

Work together NEVER.

Re: Wakey and the 'Sharing' option : Sat Mar 19, 2011 8:12 pm  

G.Price Fan Club wrote:

Does AG have that sort of money? In a word, yes.
I think some in the RL world haven't yet realised how wealthy he is.

In another word, No he doesn't.

Re: Wakey and the 'Sharing' option : Sat Mar 19, 2011 8:58 pm  

Jesus! One win against a team that has only managed a single win all season themselves and they are back. How's the search for the scoreboard going?

Re: Wakey and the 'Sharing' option : Sat Mar 19, 2011 9:15 pm  

Within a few weeks deehell will be eating his words.

Re: Wakey and the 'Sharing' option : Sat Mar 19, 2011 9:29 pm  

Therailwayendisuponus. wrote:

Within a few weeks deehell will be eating his words.

That's what I'm hearing too.

As long as it's a 50/50 deal I have no problem.
Whatever anyone thinks/historically thought about sharing has to been seen in the wider context of the game & the futures of both clubs.

TBH the more I think about it the more it seems like the logical option we've all ignored all along.
1 Stadium being used by 2 teams would give us both the quality stadium we need and give us both much more spending power due to reduced cost of upkeep.

Anyone that doubts AG's financial capabilities need to look at the total number of businesses he owns.
50% of a a stadium would roughly be equivalent to a new production plant or warehouse/distribution centre with associated machinery- would that come from his pocket? No because he's a successful businessman.

All I'm saying is this has to be considered. If it's J32 so be it- just do it right and get on with it!

Re: Wakey and the 'Sharing' option : Sat Mar 19, 2011 10:14 pm  

G.Price Fan Club wrote:

All I'm saying is this has to be considered.

Considering RW's exact words were "Wakefield offer nothing" when asked about a groundshare at Glasshoughton, I don't think he's too keen on the idea.

Added to the fact with all the work Cas have put in already, there is no way a 50/50 share should be considered.

Re: Wakey and the 'Sharing' option : Sat Mar 19, 2011 10:20 pm  

deeHell wrote:

After last years warning letters the RFL have to show they mean business. How would it look when clubs like Halifax and Leigh have worked there butts off to get facilities up to SL standard and get denied when clubs like Cas have done nothing but break promises? Like I've already said this will happen just watch this space.

Break promises?

You mean: The one stating that we'd build a new stadium? Yep, that's still in-tact, no promise broken.
Or: The one stating we'd build a stadium at Glasshoughton? Yep, that's still in tact - no promise broken.

The RFL are well aware of our situation. I suggest you go away and concentrate on worrying about your own problems. You do nothing but make yourself sound like a bitter, bitter individual.

Re: Wakey and the 'Sharing' option : Sat Mar 19, 2011 10:22 pm  

who needs flankers? wrote:

Jesus! One win against a team that has only managed a single win all season themselves and they are back. How's the search for the scoreboard going?

Hull have got one win this season but still, I agree with your point. The more they keep denying, the more our fans I believe.

Re: Wakey and the 'Sharing' option : Sat Mar 19, 2011 10:22 pm  

Gaslight wrote:

Considering RW's exact words were "Wakefield offer nothing" when asked about a groundshare at Glasshoughton, I don't think he's too keen on the idea.

Added to the fact with all the work Cas have put in already, there is no way a 50/50 share should be considered.

And costs.