Re: Warrington match thread : Tue Feb 16, 2010 9:27 am  

Gazemous wrote: Not that it helps us now, but Morley and Carvell have both been cited and face bans of 1-3 games. Westerman and McGoldrick got warnings (not sure what for in Joe's case) LINK So if they get banned at least we'll know they should've been sent off... Not that we'll stand to benefit from it now in any way at all.

Gazemous wrote: Not that it helps us now, but Morley and Carvell have both been cited and face bans of 1-3 games. Westerman and McGoldrick got warnings (not sure what for in Joe's case) LINK So if they get banned at least we'll know they should've been sent off... Not that we'll stand to benefit from it now in any way at all.

Re: Warrington match thread : Tue Feb 16, 2010 11:14 am  

Bonzo wrote:

So if they get banned at least we'll know they should've been sent off...

Not that we'll stand to benefit from it now in any way at all.

It does prove though that the officials got it wrong.
So cummings what you gonna do about thaler.

Re: Warrington match thread : Tue Feb 16, 2010 12:02 pm  

poppys mum wrote:

It does prove though that the officials got it wrong.
So cummings what you gonna do about thaler.

Make him Video Ref at Bulls v Cas.

Re: Warrington match thread : Tue Feb 16, 2010 12:13 pm  

Fully wrote:

Make him Video Ref at Bulls v Cas.

Don't say that.

Re: Warrington match thread : Tue Feb 16, 2010 12:18 pm  

Dead Man Walking wrote:

Don't say that.

I'm not saying it, it IS that!

Re: Warrington match thread : Tue Feb 16, 2010 12:20 pm  

Fully wrote:

Make him Video Ref at Bulls v Cas.

God forbid fully.

Re: Warrington match thread : Tue Feb 16, 2010 2:12 pm  

Gazemous wrote: Not that it helps us now, but Morley and Carvell have both been cited and face bans of 1-3 games. Westerman and McGoldrick got warnings (not sure what for in Joe's case) LINK http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1595

Gazemous wrote: Not that it helps us now, but Morley and Carvell have both been cited and face bans of 1-3 games. Westerman and McGoldrick got warnings (not sure what for in Joe's case) LINK http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1595

Re: Warrington match thread : Tue Feb 16, 2010 2:18 pm  

poppys mum wrote:

It does prove though that the officials got it wrong.
So cummings what you gonna do about thaler.

But what if Thaler's view was blocked ? The onus must be with the video ref Ian Smith to instruct the referee what action he should take.

Re: Warrington match thread : Tue Feb 16, 2010 3:10 pm  

Fully wrote:

I'm not saying it, it IS that!

Oh no !!!

Re: Warrington match thread : Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:20 am  

poppys mum wrote:

It does prove though that the officials got it wrong.
So cummings what you gonna do about thaler.

As it turns out,no they did not. Fans always scream for blood at what looks like a bad tackle against one of their players. They want players sent off. Well knowing what we know now,had carvell and/or morley been sent off on saturday then they would have been dismissed wrongly,cas given an unfair advantage and had they won the game on the back of that advantage it would have been an unjustified result,however cas would still have been given the two points. Had it been castleford players commiting those so called "offences" then I am sure thatt 99% of you would have seen nothing in them. The reaction of the crowd was an attempt by the cas fans to intimidate the ref and secure an unfair advantage for your team. Fortunately he did not take the bait. Had morley been sent off and you won the game on the back of your one man advantage only for morley to be later found not guilty would you now be offering the two points to warrington? Of course not!!!!!!!!