: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:49 pm  

Unckle John wrote:

its all a con its a dirty tactic used by leeds, he is playing i spoke to his sister yesturday

Dirty?

[Frosties.]

: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:51 pm  

More reasons why he should have been given the number 14 shirt, not number 9, hes going to be injury prone with that knee for all his time now, we wont see much of him imo, and he should be gutted, after targetting this match.

: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:58 pm  

Kallum Watkins' Left Boot wrote:

More reasons why he should have been given the number 14 shirt, not number 9, hes going to be injury prone with that knee for all his time now, we wont see much of him imo, and he should be gutted, after targetting this match.

Yup, the shirt number really is that important. You can tell from Diskin's early season performances that he's not bothered anymore.......

: Tue Feb 24, 2009 1:39 pm  

Kallum Watkins' Left Boot wrote:

More reasons why he should have been given the number 14 shirt, not number 9, hes going to be injury prone with that knee for all his time now, we wont see much of him imo, and he should be gutted, after targetting this match.

He misses two games early on through injury and all of a sudden hes a crock and no better than Brett Mullins. Give the guy atleast half a season before making these presumptions.

: Tue Feb 24, 2009 1:42 pm  

Danny Buderus = Bradley Clyde?

FFS I hope not

: Tue Feb 24, 2009 1:42 pm  

G1 wrote:

How good is it though that we can cope quite admirably if he does turn out to be a crock (hope not) with Diskin and McShane?

Bit early for stating that.

Regardless of results, we have not been impressive thus far this season, although early doors. The oppossition thus far has not been the best.

Hopefully you are right on this, but not convinved we can be that confident yet.

It must be a huge blow to the club and squad to be missing two big signing major players that you fully intended to be integral to the team.

: Tue Feb 24, 2009 1:46 pm  

G1 wrote:

How good is it though that we can cope quite admirably if he does turn out to be a crock (hope not) with Diskin and McShane?

Still though G, i think DB's salery will be a tad more then Brett Mullins and Bradley Clyde put together.

It's good on the pitch to have Disco and Macca playing well but on the books it's a lot of Money out and not a lot of game time.

It's only 6 weeks though i'd rather him get injured now and be fit come August time!

: Tue Feb 24, 2009 1:46 pm  

DISA wrote:

Bit early for stating that.

Regardless of results, we have not been impressive thus far this season, although early doors. The oppossition thus far has not been the best.

Hopefully you are right on this, but not convinved we can be that confident yet.

It must be a huge blow to the club and squad to be missing two big signing major players that you fully intended to be integral to the team.

Fair play, its' not like we've won the title 3 out of 5 seasons with Diskin as our only recognised hooker so it was a fairly rash statement I guess.

Oh, hang on........................

: Tue Feb 24, 2009 1:47 pm  

G1 wrote:

Fair play, its' not like we've won the title 3 out of 5 seasons with Diskin as our only recognised hooker so it was a fairly rash statement I guess.

Oh, hang on........................

Dunneman helped out in 2004 though to be fair!

: Tue Feb 24, 2009 1:48 pm  

Tony Ferrino wrote:

:lol:

Dunneman helped out in 2004 though to be fair!

Aye, and tansey in 2007 and 2008. Neither are hookers though.

You're right about the money aspect but, like you say, its' early days.