I like the way the debate continues as if it's now established fact that Sykes is an average player.
FWIW, IMO, he isn't. He's a very good player. Very solid. Does a decent job at half back and if he had another proper half alongside him he'd be doing very well, just like he did in the final dozen or so games for the Bulls last year. Like Pryce at Saints, he needs a proper play making half along side him.
Because of the struggles at the Bulls recently the focus is on him, as a lad out of position, doing his utmost to guide a struggling team around the park. A bit like the negative focus our know nowts were putting on Burrow early season.
I'd imagine the Bulls officials recognize the effort and job he's doing at the moment and the quality of the player. If anyone thinks that the struggles of the Bulls are down to Paul Sykes at stand off they should think again. The Bulls do not concede nearly 100 points to crusaders and Gnats because of who is playing stand off.
In Tony Smith's judgment Sykes was good enough to play international football and that speaks volumes to me.
Witty thread title mind you.