Re: SL RD 2 | Wigan Warriors (A) : Sun Feb 13, 2022 7:51 am  

If Dwyer gets a ban then he should have got a red. Yellow should be sufficient.

Re: SL RD 2 | Wigan Warriors (A) : Sun Feb 13, 2022 8:28 am  

Can’t see us getting the win as suspensions and injuries kick in already, but am sure we’ll have a determined dig and that’s all we can ask….

Re: SL RD 2 | Wigan Warriors (A) : Sun Feb 13, 2022 8:38 am  

Seth wrote:

If Dwyer gets a ban then he should have got a red. Yellow should be sufficient.

It was a similar incident to Austin's and he got a yellow followed by a ban so who knows?

Find it odd that incidents like that are deemed yellow cos the player has passed the ball but when a player kicks the ball defenders can run into the kicker or grab the kicker late and nobody bats an eyelid.

But thems the rules, we know a late tap on a passer is a yellow and we never seem to learn. We will go to Wigan, play with 12 for 20 mins and all talk about the effort and spirit we put in. Its time we smartened up.

Re: SL RD 2 | Wigan Warriors (A) : Sun Feb 13, 2022 9:31 am  

Marty Grrrrrrrrrr! wrote:

It was a similar incident to Austin's and he got a yellow followed by a ban so who knows?

Find it odd that incidents like that are deemed yellow cos the player has passed the ball but when a player kicks the ball defenders can run into the kicker or grab the kicker late and nobody bats an eyelid.

But thems the rules, we know a late tap on a passer is a yellow and we never seem to learn. We will go to Wigan, play with 12 for 20 mins and all talk about the effort and spirit we put in. Its time we smartened up.

And repeat. Dwyer will get a ban because that's how the RFL is reinforcing its policing of late hits this year. Judging by this weekend's games some coaches understand this. Others remain entrenched in "but what about" territory.

Re: SL RD 2 | Wigan Warriors (A) : Sun Feb 13, 2022 10:06 am  

Clearwing wrote:

And repeat. Dwyer will get a ban because that's how the RFL is reinùforcing its policing of late hits this year. Judging by this weekend's games some coaches understand this. Others remain entrenched in "but what about" territory.

The problem with the disciplinary giving a ban the following week, is why wasn't he sent off? It was suggested the ref didn't get a good look at the Austin one because he was concentrating on the tackle that followed. Fair enough, but what's the excuse this week. The officials saw it, it was on the screen and the 4th official presumably had an input. The reason that he wasn't sent off is because not a single person in the stadium thought it worthy of a red card. To then get a ban would be ridiculous. But I would not be surprised tbh.

Re: SL RD 2 | Wigan Warriors (A) : Sun Feb 13, 2022 10:13 am  

I have an impossible dream that one day we may be able to pick a team from a fit and healthy full squad.

Re: SL RD 2 | Wigan Warriors (A) : Sun Feb 13, 2022 10:18 am  

Clearwing wrote:

And repeat. Dwyer will get a ban because that's how the RFL is reinforcing its policing of late hits this year. Judging by this weekend's games some coaches understand this. Others remain entrenched in "but what about" territory.

If the Dwyer incident is the bench mark so be it. Unfortunately I can see some referees not having the courage to implement the rule.
I think the Dwyer sin bin was instrumental in us losing the game. We used up a massive amount of energy with just 11 players.

Re: SL RD 2 | Wigan Warriors (A) : Sun Feb 13, 2022 10:31 am  

Backwoodsman wrote:

If the Dwyer incident is the bench mark so be it. Unfortunately I can see some referees not having the courage to implement the rule.
I think the Dwyer sin bin was instrumental in us losing the game. We used up a massive amount of energy with just 11 players.

I completely agree that the Dwyer sin bin had a major impact but who do you blame for that?

Re: SL RD 2 | Wigan Warriors (A) : Sun Feb 13, 2022 10:41 am  

Marty Grrrrrrrrrr! wrote:

I completely agree that the Dwyer sin bin had a major impact but who do you blame for that?

There’s no one to blame other than the player IMO. They know the rules.

There’s an argument to he had though that if a late tackle is going to be an automatic ban then its should be a red car offence at the time.

I 100% understand why they are wanting those tackles out of the game, it’s going yo be difficult though because a sport played as fast and hard as RL it is sometimes very hard for a player to pull out of a tackle, it will be s very contentious issue all season.

Fwiw I don’t think dwyer will cop a ban, it looked to me like dwyer couldn’t actually see clearly that the wire player had passed the ball has he was behind him when he tackled him.

I also don’t think Bentleys ban will be as bad as people think, the justification the ref gave was that it was with a clenched fist. It wasn’t. It was reckless and deserved a red.

Re: SL RD 2 | Wigan Warriors (A) : Sun Feb 13, 2022 11:04 am  

Marty Grrrrrrrrrr! wrote:

I completely agree that the Dwyer sin bin had a major impact but who do you blame for that?

I don’t attach blame to anyone. As a former player (amateur) failed to make the professional grade. Things happen in the heat of the moment. Thought the sin bin was harsh, although a penalty was justified. If that’s the benchmark I am ok with that ,but that law has to apply consistently throughout the season. I doubt that Will happen, but we will shall see. Looking at the expression on Holmes’ face I think he thought he was on a red card. I await with interest to view the next Dwyer type situation and see what the referees decision will be.