Re: Ryan Bailey : Tue Aug 31, 2010 9:29 pm  

Morleys lap dog.

Re: Ryan Bailey : Tue Aug 31, 2010 9:36 pm  

hateful fella,

Re: Ryan Bailey : Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:04 am  

None of the forwards gave Leeds much oomph except for Eastwood for a spell. More worrying for me than Bailey was Leuluai. He has been our best starting prop for the past few seasons alongside Peacock, but was awful in the semi against Sts and completely anonymous in the final. Given the shortness of his spells, he needs to have a massive impact when on, or quite simply not get picked.

Re: Ryan Bailey : Wed Sep 01, 2010 8:12 am  

BrisbaneRhino wrote:

None of the forwards gave Leeds much oomph except for Eastwood for a spell. More worrying for me than Bailey was Leuluai. He has been our best starting prop for the past few seasons alongside Peacock, but was awful in the semi against Sts and completely anonymous in the final. Given the shortness of his spells, he needs to have a massive impact when on, or quite simply not get picked.

Leuluai's stats in the previous two SL games suggested he was gearing up to a big effort for the final, just didn't materialise. Has the feeling of past his sell-by-date though. Let's see how the pack fares in the play-offs before making such judgements.

Re: Ryan Bailey : Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:30 am  

Gotcha wrote:

I don't know, why don't you tell us if you are so sure?

This makes no sense.

I ask a question and you say "you tell us if you are so sure". It makes no sense. What am I so sure about?

Re: Ryan Bailey : Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:33 am  

Moomin wrote:

This makes no sense.

I ask a question and you say "you tell us if you are so sure". It makes no sense. What am I so sure about?

You were the one who said about 3rd man in. There is no stats for this ever, and IMO is a complete myth. But as you are so sure it happens, you must therefore be able to answer the question.

Re: Ryan Bailey : Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:35 am  

Gotcha wrote:

You were the one who said about 3rd man in. There is no stats for this ever, and IMO is a complete myth. But as you are so sure it happens, you must therefore be able to answer the question.

Well duh, no, thats why I asked the question. Why would I ask a question if I already knew the answer? I just think its strange that someone commented that he made 29 tackles, when in reality, the only time I noticed him was when he ran away from Carvell and when he cheap shotted Riley.

Re: Ryan Bailey : Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:40 am  

Moomin wrote:

Well duh, no, thats why I asked the question. Why would I ask a question if I already knew the answer? I just think its strange that someone commented that he made 29 tackles, when in reality, the only time I noticed him was when he ran away from Carvell and when he cheap shotted Riley.

Ok then, he made 29 one on one tackles with no misses. Prove it wrong.

Re: Ryan Bailey : Wed Sep 01, 2010 5:31 pm  

Gotcha wrote:

Ok then, he made 29 one on one tackles with no misses. Prove it wrong.

just finished watching the match.

you're wrong. but i think you knew that

Re: Ryan Bailey : Wed Sep 01, 2010 8:41 pm  

Wouldn't have a clue about the actual stats but I need notice a number of occasions on Saturday where he was 3rd in or barely got involved