Re: Wakefield v Leeds - In Game + Post Match Thread : Sun Feb 14, 2010 7:13 pm  

rhinoms wrote:

I thought the same persistent infringement.

It looked to me for constant layingon/niggling at the PTB - your boys discipline was shocking to be fair. But when you started playing you looked dangerous on every set, I don't think I have one fingernail left to speak of!

As you've said, I think if u can sort out the discipline and just get back to your "keep the ball alive" brand of rugby, then there's not many will beat you this year.

Re: Wakefield v Leeds - In Game + Post Match Thread : Sun Feb 14, 2010 7:28 pm  

Hollywood Harrigan wrote:

Radio Leeds assumed that it was for persistent holding down after he'd warned them. Was this not the case?

Just goes to show those who weren't there shouldn't comment.

The player wasnt even on the floor when the ref called it.

More than likely it was for reefing but it could have been for mouthing.

Re: Wakefield v Leeds - In Game + Post Match Thread : Sun Feb 14, 2010 7:34 pm  

The penalty in question was for a ball steal, Sinfield was near by but not involvedin the tackle, I think was was sin binned for dissent. Although, the ball steal could have been given as a knock on, it's a 50/50 call.

Re: Wakefield v Leeds - In Game + Post Match Thread : Sun Feb 14, 2010 7:37 pm  

Criggcat wrote:

Erm ........ Salford


Happy Valentines

Re: Wakefield v Leeds - In Game + Post Match Thread : Sun Feb 14, 2010 7:55 pm  

Head High Tackle wrote:

Just goes to show those who weren't there shouldn't comment.

The player wasnt even on the floor when the ref called it.

More than likely it was for reefing but it could have been for mouthing.

I have not commented on any aspects of play in the game as I wasnt there. It was actually a question aimed at you because as I said, thats what Radio Leeds said. You dont have to get ratty with me though, it's not my fault im 6'3.

Re: Wakefield v Leeds - In Game + Post Match Thread : Sun Feb 14, 2010 7:58 pm  

Hollywood Harrigan wrote:

I have not commented on any aspects of play in the game as I wasnt there. It was actually a question aimed at you because as I said, thats what Radio Leeds said. You dont have to get ratty with me though, it's not my fault im 6'3.

Don't worry, he's just got his panties in a twist cos of the result, he should have calmed down by tomorrow.

Re: Wakefield v Leeds - In Game + Post Match Thread : Sun Feb 14, 2010 7:58 pm  

TrinityIHC wrote:

Don't worry, he's just got his panties in a twist cos of the result, he should have calmed down by tomorrow.

You obviously dont know him very well

Re: Wakefield v Leeds - In Game + Post Match Thread : Sun Feb 14, 2010 8:00 pm  

TrinityIHC wrote:

Don't worry, he's just got his panties in a twist cos of the result, he should have calmed down by tomorrow.

Nah, its nothing to do with the game. He gets envious of people when he cant see past their chest.

Re: Wakefield v Leeds - In Game + Post Match Thread : Sun Feb 14, 2010 8:10 pm  

Re: Wakefield v Leeds - In Game + Post Match Thread : Sun Feb 14, 2010 8:12 pm  

The Jigga Jigga wrote:

The Irony

When was the last time Warrington won the title sunshine