: Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:00 am  

We were poor, the ref wasn't. He made some calls that most miss. People spend hour after hour writing thread after thread criticising the refs for their performance (although some are less keen to cast that critical eye over our squad and coaching staff at the moment) and when one (or two) of their number spot a little-known infringement, they're the ones at fault?
We are poor at the moment when compared to our recent standards. End of the world? No.

Re: From a neutrals point of view... : Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:19 am  

mutley cat wrote:

a pass is intentional a knock on is unintentional and if a player who is in front of that player picks the ball up then it would be penalised for offside because of the intent of the reciving player . but hey don't let facts cloud your judgment . 4/10

All this talk of getting old
It's getting me down my love
Like a cat in a bag, waiting to drown
This time I'm comin' down

Re: From a neutrals point of view... : Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:25 am  

King Monkey wrote:

All this talk of getting old
It's getting me down my love
Like a cat in a bag, waiting to drown
This time I'm comin' down

The drugs dont work Danny... stay off them!

Re: From a neutrals point of view... : Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:29 am  

Hollywood Harrigan wrote:

The drugs dont work Danny... stay off them!

Can I transfer from the paracetamol and get some of what mutley cat is on? They're hallucogenic and make you talk in riddles or simply repeat what someone just said but make you argue it anyway.

Thats the sum of his posts on this board the last few days.

Re: From a neutrals point of view... : Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:31 am  

King Monkey wrote:

Can I transfer from the paracetamol and get some of what mutley cat is on? They're hallucogenic and make you talk in riddles or simply repeat what someone just said but make you argue it anyway.

Thats the sum of his posts on this board the last few days.

TBF I feel like I have been repeating the same stuff to the majority over that period of time. It's like banging your head against a brick wall (or in Damo's case just a brick) trying to get through to them.

: Sun Apr 12, 2009 10:00 am  

i would love to see a try scored from a scrum that gets refered and the vid ref chalk it off for feeding!! that would be a thred really worth having!! or maybe not

Re: From a neutrals point of view... : Sun Apr 12, 2009 10:05 am  

Hollywood Harrigan wrote:

TBF I feel like I have been repeating the same stuff to the majority over that period of time. It's like banging your head against a brick wall (or in Damo's case just a brick) trying to get through to them.

So... please explain exactly why Burrow's try was disallowed – I believe it was something to do with a Frenchman, a Kiwi and a failed attempt to retract appropriately.

Re: From a neutrals point of view... : Sun Apr 12, 2009 10:07 am  

LS16_Rhino wrote:

So... please explain exactly why Burrow's try was disallowed – I believe it was something to do with a Frenchman, a Kiwi and a failed attempt to retract appropriately.

: Sun Apr 12, 2009 10:07 am  

sgtwilko wrote:

i would love to see a try scored from a scrum that gets refered and the vid ref chalk it off for feeding!! that would be a thred really worth having!! or maybe not

...or the same scenario from an incorrect PTB (which, by the rule book, 99% of them are these days)

Re: From a neutrals point of view... : Sun Apr 12, 2009 10:09 am  

King Monkey wrote:

All this talk of getting old
It's getting me down my love
Like a cat in a bag, waiting to drown
This time I'm comin' down

great comeback , but at least you've been educated a little