Re: Brierley. : Tue Mar 22, 2016 4:22 pm  

brearley84 wrote:

nice to get brierley infront of you, after the signings of ferres and mullally from us

We PAID money for Griffin off you lot. You guys should be eternally grateful.

Re: Brierley. : Tue Mar 22, 2016 9:40 pm  

brearley84 wrote:

15 pages of not wanting him eh

Erm, you recognise numbers but not words? Apart from Frosties and was it Sgt Wilko I don't see anyone who rated him. As I said Gregg McNally Part Deux!

Re: Brierley. : Tue Mar 22, 2016 10:49 pm  

ryano wrote:

Erm, you recognise numbers but not words? Apart from Frosties and was it Sgt Wilko I don't see anyone who rated him. As I said Gregg McNally Part Deux!

I rate him too. I think he's a good player who would have filled a role for us for a few years.
But I wasn't desperate for us to sign him nor am I devastated that he's signed for someone else. For me he'd have been a luxury signing not an essential signing for us.

Re: Brierley. : Fri Mar 25, 2016 6:03 pm  

ryano wrote:

Erm, you recognise numbers but not words? Apart from Frosties and was it Sgt Wilko I don't see anyone who rated him. As I said Gregg McNally Part Deux!

I think he's a good player and would have fitted in my side well, but even for us I wouldnt have busted a gut to get him to Bulls. I don't think he is that good. certainley glad we didnt get into a bidding war for him.