Re: Joe Westerman : Sun Oct 18, 2015 7:50 pm  

if we had signed Westerman do you reckon i could get a lift in to work aswell?

Re: Joe Westerman : Sun Oct 18, 2015 7:52 pm  

Gotcha wrote:

FFS grow up mate. I know in your profession false promises are a common theme, but for a club that proclaims to be loyal, it smacks in the face of that. Is that theme not something you have continually praised the club on? Bit inconsistent of you now then.

Look shag, I'll stop being delicate about it, it's not worthy of discussion because you make shizzle up. You pretend you're in the know but we all remember your Phil Daly form. You talk to imaginary people and share your imaginary conversations on here.

You keep at it ,I'm checking out on this one.

Re: Joe Westerman : Sun Oct 18, 2015 7:53 pm  

Gotcha wrote:

A minute ago you didn't believe Hull would allow him to leave, now you are making assumptions.

Do you mean when i posted this?

The Biffs Back wrote:

Why would Hull FC allow one of their better players to discuss terms with a rival SL club?
IMO that question is also the answer I'm afraid

You've obviously read it the wrong way Gotcha

Ill make it a bit clearer,although i thought that my initial post was pretty clear

IMO Hull FC can't wait to get rid and hence that they have allowed rival SL clubs to speak to him

Re: Joe Westerman : Sun Oct 18, 2015 8:01 pm  

SmokeyTA wrote:

if we had signed Westerman do you reckon i could get a lift in to work aswell?

Providing it's not on a Tuesday. He'll be busy picking up GH's dry cleaning then.

Re: Joe Westerman : Sun Oct 18, 2015 8:06 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

It would be if it were true.

But some guy posting Chinese whispers on the Internet and suddenly he thinks supporters should join in with him condemning the clubs actions which happen to be completely unfounded is ridiclous.

Basically what you're saying is everyone should believe you.....just because you say so, and we should judge the club by that say so.

You've mentioned a few times of what you've heard going on in meetings at Leeds, when you you aren't privy to them first hand. Your claim that the Leeds club accepted and owned up that they treated Hardaker incorrectly over his World Cup dismissal was nonsense too.

I am not saying anyone should believe me. I am making a point. I have posted here long enough and clearly pointed out enough that I don't have the insecurities of others. If I post something it is because I am confident enough in what is said. I know it is correct so it is good enough for me.

I mean come on, I am not going to apologise just because I have far more knowledge on some things than others. Had I seen a valid argument against the point I made on here then I would certainly consider it. But lack of knowledge from those arguing isn't a valid argument matey.

What I will give you an assurance on though is that if anyone with true connections can give an assurance that Westerman or Clarke did not agree terms with Leeds, then I will apologise immediately.

Re: Joe Westerman : Sun Oct 18, 2015 8:09 pm  

Gotcha wrote:

I don't proclaim to know inside tracks.

Gotcha wrote:

I am not going to apologise just because I have far more knowledge on some things than others.

Re: Joe Westerman : Sun Oct 18, 2015 8:11 pm  

Gotcha wrote:

I mean come on, I am not going to apologise just because I have far more knowledge on some things than others. Had I seen a valid argument against the point I made on here then I would certainly consider it. But lack of knowledge from those arguing isn't a valid argument matey.

What I will give you an assurance on though is that if anyone with true connections can give an assurance that Westerman or Clarke did not agree terms with Leeds, then I will apologise immediately.

Oh good lord

Re: Joe Westerman : Sun Oct 18, 2015 8:12 pm  

Gotcha wrote:

I am not saying anyone should believe me. I am making a point. I have posted here long enough and clearly pointed out enough that I don't have the insecurities of others. If I post something it is because I am confident enough in what is said. I know it is correct so it is good enough for me.

I mean come on, I am not going to apologise just because I have far more knowledge on some things than others. Had I seen a valid argument against the point I made on here then I would certainly consider it. But lack of knowledge from those arguing isn't a valid argument matey.

What I will give you an assurance on though is that if anyone with true connections can give an assurance that Westerman or Clarke did not agree terms with Leeds, then I will apologise immediately.

Do you know it's correct though?

A - Were you in the meetings?

B - Was the person who told you in the meetings?

Re: Joe Westerman : Sun Oct 18, 2015 8:19 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

Do you know it's correct though?

A - Were you in the meetings?

B - Was the person who told you in the meetings?

What meetings are you Referring to? Contract terms?

I am confident that Clarke and Westerman agreed terms to answer your first question, and were assured by Leeds the deal was done, hence why I stated the point I did. Had I not been confident I wouldn't have stated it.

As said if someone can prove otherwise, then you have my assurance of an apology.

In relation to my first post on this thread tonight. I repeat an earlier post, I was not sure last night when told about Westerman deal pulled out but Burgess deal a goer, however now I know about the Westerman situation, I am confident this is the case also. However, I was very confident on Clarke ending up our player also.

Re: Joe Westerman : Sun Oct 18, 2015 8:29 pm  

Gotcha wrote:

What meetings are you Referring to? Contract terms?

I am confident that Clarke and Westerman agreed terms to answer your first question, and were assured by Leeds the deal was done, hence why I stated the point I did. Had I not been confident I wouldn't have stated it.

As said if someone can prove otherwise, then you have my assurance of an apology.

In relation to my first post on this thread tonight. I repeat an earlier post, I was not sure last night when told about Westerman deal pulled out but Burgess deal a goer, however now I know about the Westerman situation, I am confident this is the case also. However, I was very confident on Clarke ending up our player also.

Translation - you weren't in the meetings nor was the person who told you. Yet you know it's correct. Hmmm.