Re: WCC : Sun Feb 21, 2016 9:09 pm  

Biff Tannen wrote:

they put a massive effort in first half to be fair, Cuthbertson had done 26 tackles and 7 offloads by the 33rd minute! again we probably paid a price for not rotating a bit more we only used one interchange by half time and our go to men were pretty gassed, it must have been hugely deflating seeing that so soft first try go in so early after HT and i think we did give up a little last 15 minutes mainly due to fatigue and knowing game was up which enabled the wide margin.

Yep, I thought Mullaley should've been on earlier, he looked decent in his stint, but we really lacked size in the form of Keinhorst, and Walters. It's clear McDermott doesn't trust Achurch to do the tough stuff, but he'd offer more than 3 of the 4 second rowers in the Leeds 17 tonight.

Re: WCC : Sun Feb 21, 2016 9:11 pm  

I think he played Keinhorst and Walters for their contribution to the GF win which i fully agree with but like you say, it was clear he didn't trust them in the thick of the first half when it was nip and tuck.

Re: WCC : Sun Feb 21, 2016 9:14 pm  

Budgiezilla wrote:

needs to be scrapped, complete waste of time.

I would scrap it for a while because it has run its course. Seeing players on the pitch afterwards laughing and joking around.....that's showing it up for the exhibition it's become. That wouldn't happened post CC or GF

Re: WCC : Sun Feb 21, 2016 9:15 pm  

Biff Tannen wrote:

I think he played Keinhorst and Walters for their contribution to the GF win which i fully agree with but like you say, it was clear he didn't trust them in the thick of the first half when it was nip and tuck.

I think he played them because we had no one else.

Re: WCC : Sun Feb 21, 2016 9:16 pm  

Ron wrote:

Commentators were a disgrace there when cheering Garbutt... guy throws a haymaker at someone not even looking at him.

No mate , you are mixing him up with Westwood on Green , except Tamau was stood up not flat on his back , least not to start with

Re: WCC : Sun Feb 21, 2016 9:17 pm  

You can't just want to scrap the WCC cos you got spanked!

I think this should be a message to the RFL that they need to invest in the grass roots of the game and stimulate a growth in talent pool for the Super League - the NRL is leaving us well behind.

Re: WCC : Sun Feb 21, 2016 9:19 pm  

Leeds Thirteen wrote:

No mate , you are mixing him up with Westwood on Green , except Tamau was stood up not flat on his back , least not to start with

Westwood was disgraceful as well,but I don't remember the commentators applauding him for that... Do you think it's Ok to swing like that when the opposition is looking at another player? Should get a big ban.

Re: WCC : Sun Feb 21, 2016 9:19 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

I think he played them because we had no one else.

Achurch??

Re: WCC : Sun Feb 21, 2016 9:26 pm  

DrFeelgood wrote:

You can't just want to scrap the WCC cos you got spanked!

I think this should be a message to the RFL that they need to invest in the grass roots of the game and stimulate a growth in talent pool for the Super League - the NRL is leaving us well behind.

it would be typical of RL to scrap it simply because we are getting spanked. Then in 5-10 years when a few England performances have gotten everyone all excited and the cheerleaders have told us how much more intense the game is now because of Fax v Wakefield in the super wonder 8's and we can start it up again for a few years, be even worse, and scrap it all again.

Re: WCC : Sun Feb 21, 2016 9:31 pm  

DrFeelgood wrote:

You can't just want to scrap the WCC cos you got spanked!

I think this should be a message to the RFL that they need to invest in the grass roots of the game and stimulate a growth in talent pool for the Super League - the NRL is leaving us well behind.

No I wasn't a fan of this extended concept last year and I'm not one for going gooey eyed at anything NRL.

And ppl need stop with this "it'll show us what we need to do" BS.

It's almost 20 years since the 1997 competition. They'l area still miles ahead and they always will be. Playing them one game a year won't improve us. The likes of a Mike Cooper has gone to NRL turned into a good prop BUT that's because he's playing against then EVERY week.....not ONE week a year IF you qualify every year.

And it's not the 80 mins on the pitch why they win, it's the things off the pitch you don't see why they win. Plus again I'll repeat this, too much respect for the Aussies thing. Compare and contrast if that is Wigan or Saints coming for a playoff game to the reception NQC got tonight and all week, like chalk and cheese. I mean Thurston was one of their best players but definately not MOM yet he was given the MOM award such is the brown nosing given towards the NRL.