: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:21 pm  

tvoc wrote:

I don't include League Leaders where the Champions are decided by a play off.

[enter Stirlingshire mode]

I don't remember there being a playoff system to decide the Champions before Superleague? I'm sure it never happened before.

[exit Stirlingshire mode]

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:23 pm  

Lord_Percy wrote:

TVOC?

Alot of TVOCs stuff is very interesting (the old newspaper clippings etc) but rafts of stats are my daily job, I find them incredibly boring.

Reading someones league table of trophies for their thesis is not my idea of enjoyment.

It clearly bothers Judder Man though.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:23 pm  

Dave Heron's Moustache wrote:

[enter Stirlingshire mode]

I don't remember there being a playoff system to decide the Champions before Superleague? I'm sure it never happened before.

[exit Stirlingshire mode]

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:26 pm  

Lord_Percy wrote:

TVOC?

I don't care about any lists as such, I just like trashing them if possible.

Judder Man wrote:

Try this link from Dr Michhael Sheard of York St John University

www2.yorksj.ac.uk/apps/_Uploads/Image_Lib/DownloadDoc.asp?resource_ID=29812 -

No Premiership, Floodlit or County Cups in there then. I could understand the case for excluding those on the basis that they were not open to all clubs to enter I guess. He's obviously thought about how to recognise achievement that falls short of winning the individual comps and one that alters for different eras of the sport.

Inevitably it's a subjective scoring system he is applying though.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:46 pm  

Dave Heron's Moustache wrote:

[enter Stirlingshire mode]

I don't remember there being a playoff system to decide the Champions before Superleague? I'm sure it never happened before.

[exit Stirlingshire mode]

Surely this is provocation ? Seemingly not allowed at the moment ?

I bet it goes down as 'light hearted banter' though......

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:14 pm  

Stirlingshire Saint wrote:

Surely this is provocation ? Seemingly not allowed at the moment ?

I bet it goes down as 'light hearted banter' though......

Seemed light hearted enough to me.



Chill out dude. I know from the thread on redvee and your posts on here that you feel the world is against you but i am sure someone, somewhere, likes you.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:16 pm  

King Monkey wrote:

:NAUGHTY:

That's light hearted banter (I hope - ). No name calling or bad language.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:18 pm  

Stirlingshire Saint wrote:

Surely this is provocation ? Seemingly not allowed at the moment ?

I bet it goes down as 'light hearted banter' though......

compared to some of your "hate" filled postings on the Entertainers site it seems very light hearted IMHO.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:00 pm  

G1 wrote:

Chill out dude. I know from the thread on redvee and your posts on here that you feel the world is against you but i am sure someone, somewhere, likes you.

Not at all, I just find the double standards funny in all honesty on here. There is no point in having a moderator on here, anything goes, insults, foul language etc. Its a free for all....

DoubleAone wrote:

compared to some of your "hate" filled postings on the Entertainers site it seems very light hearted IMHO.

Light hearted banter

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:09 pm  

Stirlingshire Saint wrote:

Not at all, I just find the double standards funny in all honesty on here. There is no point in having a moderator on here, anything goes, insults, foul language etc. Its a free for all....



Light hearted banter

The simple answer is........ if you dont like it, then dont come on here.

Aitch tee aitch.