Re: Sutcliffe and Minns secure long term deals. : Fri Jul 05, 2013 9:08 pm  

W55ARE wrote:

Hang on die hard fan. Take a look outside the rose tinted glasses.

He did f all in the last 60 minutes of the game. I mean nothing. Yes he's young and will come on but to sit back and not get involved like he did is a joke.
Lazy player.

I saw him involved in plenty of Leeds plays in the last 60 mins. What exactly were you expecting from a young, inexperienced half playing in a secondary role behind Burrow, playing behind a young pack often on the back foot, away at Warrington?
Your comment regarding him and Hunslet shows you up. Criticise his performance if you want, just don't be such a pillock with it.

Re: Sutcliffe and Minns secure long term deals. : Fri Jul 05, 2013 9:09 pm  

W55ARE wrote:

Well done Foster great game.

Did Sutcliffe play. Never saw him apart from that one try.
Hope he doesn't come to Hunslet next season we don't want to be carrying players like him.

Are you blind?

Re: Sutcliffe and Minns secure long term deals. : Fri Jul 05, 2013 9:13 pm  

W55ARE wrote:

Well done Foster great game.

Did Sutcliffe play. Never saw him apart from that one try.

Which try? The one he scored or the one he set up for Hardaker.

Re: Sutcliffe and Minns secure long term deals. : Fri Jul 05, 2013 9:38 pm  

I love it, A Hunslet mug slating one of our players

Don't worry, Joe Vickery is still ready for you

Re: Sutcliffe and Minns secure long term deals. : Sat Jul 06, 2013 11:18 am  

Sutcliffe was not as involved anywhere near enough. That is to be expected. The coach himself has said Sutcliffe needs to work on his game management and he does. Still looks class to me.

However, this does put real pressure on Burrow, especially when he also has to cover Dummy half. If Harrigan was an objective poster like he claims he would recognise that in his usual rabid barbs about Burrow.

Re: Sutcliffe and Minns secure long term deals. : Sat Jul 06, 2013 11:53 am  

G1 wrote:

Sutcliffe was not as involved anywhere near enough. That is to be expected. The coach himself has said Sutcliffe needs to work on his game management and he does. Still looks class to me.

However, this does put real pressure on Burrow, especially when he also has to cover Dummy half. If Harrigan was an objective poster like he claims he would recognise that in his usual rabid barbs about Burrow.

Agreed.sutcliffe is still a fair way off being at the level where we can expect him to go to places like warrington and control the game in the way a sinfield can.he is showing more than enough glimpses of class though and these experiences he is getting at his age will pay off down the line for him and the club.

As you say,this means burrow has a lot more responsability,and from what i have seen he is doing a good job.

Re: Sutcliffe and Minns secure long term deals. : Sat Jul 06, 2013 2:33 pm  

G1 wrote:

Sutcliffe was not as involved anywhere near enough. That is to be expected. The coach himself has said Sutcliffe needs to work on his game management and he does. Still looks class to me.

However, this does put real pressure on Burrow, especially when he also has to cover Dummy half. If Harrigan was an objective poster like he claims he would recognise that in his usual rabid barbs about Burrow.

Absolutely agree.

I'm glad for Burrow that he is being given the chance to show his credentials far away from being the 80 mins hooker he is most def. not.....again unfortunately due only to injuries.

Of the "essential" triumvirate of recent years I would only prioritise the retention of Sinfield (at LF) foremost over Burrow. McGuire will be even less of a threat after his latest injury: Sutcliffe is his replacement.

Re: Sutcliffe and Minns secure long term deals. : Sat Jul 06, 2013 4:33 pm  

nantwichexile wrote:

Absolutely agree.

I'm glad for Burrow that he is being given the chance to show his credentials far away from being the 80 mins hooker he is most def. not.....again unfortunately due only to injuries.

Of the "essential" triumvirate of recent years I would only prioritise the retention of Sinfield (at LF) foremost over Burrow. McGuire will be even less of a threat after his latest injury: Sutcliffe is his replacement.

I know you and a few others on here think sinfield should go back to 13 however we all know that wont ever happen now.so what do you think we should do when ward is fit aswell as sinfield? who gets the 13 shirt out of sutcliffe,ward and singleton who has been going well in the Position.

I cant see sutcliffe as a 7,infact he may even end up as a 13 long term IMO.

Re: Sutcliffe and Minns secure long term deals. : Sat Jul 06, 2013 4:40 pm  

Biff Tannen wrote:

I know you and a few others on here think sinfield should go back to 13 however we all know that wont ever happen now.so what do you think we should do when ward is fit aswell as sinfield? who gets the 13 shirt out of sutcliffe,ward and singleton who has been going well in the Position.

I cant see sutcliffe as a 7,infact he may even end up as a 13 long term IMO.

Over complicating things a bit there.

Sinfield to 13, Ward in back row with Ablett, and Singleton at prop which he is. That's what it should be.

Re: Sutcliffe and Minns secure long term deals. : Sat Jul 06, 2013 4:59 pm  

Gotcha wrote:

Over complicating things a bit there.

Sinfield to 13, Ward in back row with Ablett, and Singleton at prop which he is. That's what it should be.

Agh,not saying i disagree with moving sinfield back to 13 but it wont happen,so like i say,one shirt is realisticaly up for grabs assuming burrow stays at 7 which i think he will as he has gone well lately as has mcshane at 9.