Re: Buderus : Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:12 am  

tad rhino wrote:

and how much is he on?loads of people seem to know what he earns but i think it's balls. people surmise how much he is on

£4,000,263.45 per game.

True story.

Seriously though, I doubt he's over for the weather. And time will only tell if he will become a good, bad or indifferent Leeds player. However if he does fall into the latter categories, that's bad enough. But then when you consider value for money that could make it a whole lot worse. For example, consider Brett Mullins and Shane Millard. Both ozzies who didn't set the world alight in a Leeds shirt, well were frankly awful and both stayed for just 1 year IIRC. Now which stands out as the worse signing? You hear the Mullins references alot, not so much the Millard ones.

: Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:14 am  

i think GH is just to tight to go silly! thats why others have left. i doubt very much that he is on more than peacock,sinfield etc

Re: Buderus : Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:15 am  

tad rhino wrote:

and how much is he on?loads of people seem to know what he earns but i think it's balls. people surmise how much he is on

i agree, the fans go on saying "he is on this, he is on that" just presuming he is over here for the Money. I suspect Buderus has made a lot of money playing for the Knights, maybe some Aussie's come over here for the experience, culture and chapter in the familys life. Yes most come over for the £££££ but not all do. The fans can only speculate.

Re: Buderus : Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:16 am  

RhinoNeil wrote:

The fans can only speculate.

Yup.

Re: Buderus : Fri Apr 17, 2009 10:15 am  

RhinoNeil wrote:

i agree, the fans go on saying "he is on this, he is on that" just presuming he is over here for the Money. I suspect Buderus has made a lot of money playing for the Knights, maybe some Aussie's come over here for the experience, culture and chapter in the familys life. Yes most come over for the £££££ but not all do. The fans can only speculate.

I imagine that he is over for the money, and will probably have got a decent increase for coming here. He may not be paid as much as some at Leeds and SL, but he won't have taken a pay cut.

Re: Buderus : Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:09 am  

leicester_rhino wrote:

I imagine that he is over for the money, and will probably have got a decent increase for coming here. He may not be paid as much as some at Leeds and SL, but he won't have taken a pay cut.

So Buderus got an increase on $400,000 and is on less than some at Leeds?

I doubt that.

Re: Buderus : Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:04 pm  

Kifaru wrote:

So Buderus got an increase on $400,000 and is on less than some at Leeds?

I doubt that.

I don't know what he earns now, or what he may have earned in the past, I just think it is naive to think that someone wouldn't want something in return for moving him and his family to the other side of the world.

Oh yeah, it must be the prestige of playing for Leeds

Re: Buderus : Fri Apr 17, 2009 2:42 pm  

leicester_rhino wrote:

I don't know what he earns now, or what he may have earned in the past, I just think it is naive to think that someone wouldn't want something in return for moving him and his family to the other side of the world.

Oh yeah, it must be the prestige of playing for Leeds

just because he's moved, doesn't mean he hasn't taken a pay cut. it more likely that leeds offered more then Newcastle (or around the same, and he fancied a complete change), however both will have offered him less then he was on before.

: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:07 pm  

I just hope Buderus isn't going to be one of those players that we never see play.

Re: Buderus : Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:19 pm  

rhinoms wrote:

:lol:
I still remember the "hetherington out" banner's

I recall seeing a supporter with the words "Hetherington out" on the back of his replica shirt in the early days of Gawwy taking charge