: Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:59 am  

DISA wrote:

At this moment due to Smiths contract been outdated, Donald is on more money than Smith. I bet even what Smith is eventually offered, is on no more than a par with Donald. That is ridiculous.

Do you actually have any idea what these 2 people are paid? This time last year did you think Smith was worth more than Donald? Personally I have only ever once known how much a player was earning at Leeds, and that was only because I knew the person who brokered his mortgage (who certainly shouldn't have told me). I know from that experience that the actual figure was wildly at odds with what everybody here claimed to be the "known" salary of the player at the time. Until somebody who actually knows what the salary situation at the club is comments on it, I take all these ramblings with a bucket of salt. You still haven't explained why you think Donald's signing has any baring on Lee Smith's contrract offer.

If I didn't know better I'd think you just liked moaning.

: Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:02 pm  

El Diablo wrote:

Do you actually have any idea what these 2 people are paid? This time last year did you think Smith was worth more than Donald? Personally I have only ever once known how much a player was earning at Leeds, and that was only because I knew the person who brokered his mortgage (who certainly shouldn't have told me). I know from that experience that the actual figure was wildly at odds with what everybody here claimed to be the "known" salary of the player at the time. Until somebody who actually knows what the salary situation at the club is comments on it, I take all these ramblings with a bucket of salt. You still haven't explained why you think Donald's signing has any baring on Lee Smith's contrract offer.

If I didn't know better I'd think you just liked moaning.

My jobs already been done. No need for further.

But by the way, I never said it had effected Smiths contract. I only commented on what the priority should have been first. Leave the assumptions to the knee jerkers.

: Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:05 pm  

DISA wrote:

My jobs already been done. No need for further.

What, your intention was to make people think you've got broken biscuits in your head?

: Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:06 pm  

DISA wrote:

My jobs already been done. No need for further.

But by the way, I never said it had effected Smiths contract. I only commented on what the priority should have been first. Leave the assumptions to the knee jerkers.

But you dont know what was prioritised. Just speculating as usual.

Negotiations could have been running alongside, just that donald is happy with whats been offered so agreed.

: Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:06 pm  

RescuedBlue wrote:

What, your intention was to make people think you've got broken biscuits in your head?

: Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:14 pm  

DISA wrote:

Why could that person oustside him therefore not be a youngster from the academy (as we are doing now), on a much reduced salary.

We are trying that at the moment with the centre position.

Not really working is it????

: Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:18 pm  

EmmaMur01 wrote:

We are trying that at the moment with the centre position.

Not really working is it????

Doubt you'll get a reply

Disa's jobs already been done. He says there's no need for further.

Thats right. He has started spouting nonsense, then when several people pull him up on his comments he comes out with this little beauty!

: Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:23 pm  

EmmaMur01 wrote:

We are trying that at the moment with the centre position.

Not really working is it????

Why did you miss off the rest of the quote Emma? I specifically mentioned Senior and been outside of him. What is that relevance to the other centre position?

That same centre position that a certain poster on here now wetting his knickers, actually stated that we did not need an Australian/overseas player and we should play kids, as there is no point throwing big money at a position that is not important. But of course the wing is.

: Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:26 pm  

DISA wrote:

My jobs already been done. No need for further.

But by the way, I never said it had effected Smiths contract. I only commented on what the priority should have been first. Leave the assumptions to the knee jerkers.

But you don't know what the priority was. Do you?

What is it that you perceive your "job" here to be, exactly?

: Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:31 pm  

El Diablo wrote:

But you don't know what the priority was. Do you?

The priority should have been resigning the GF winning man of the match before this season started. The fact it as waited this long is farsical.

Once that was realized they then should have been allocting the necessary funds (subject to not been out of par with other internationals) into that new contract. If they had to sacrifice someone to have those funds, then a winger coming out of contract was the perfect opportunity.

However, it might be they do still have those funds, and will resign what should have been priority number one. In which case if you go back to page 2 and in my response to Emma you will see I already covered this.