Once were Loiners wrote:
I know its a bit chicken and egg with respect to mistakes vs style of play, but I tend to agree with Arthur. I think a chunk of our mistakes are because of the style we are trying to play. Some are down to execution, but is it a surprise we panic when we have decent field position given how rarely we get it? Or that players continually running the ball out of trouble either drop the ball under pressure or try dumb offloads? Other errors like kicking out on the full should have been stamped out on day one.
We also have a squad who could not easily execute a more 'basic' game requiring forwards to be much more physical. Lisone can do this but only when the opposition are not up for it - a classic flat track bully. Holroyd can bang a big but for a big guy he doesn't run the ball in with enough venom, and Sangare is worse. Oledzki is a worker not a dynamic forward, and he really doesn't stand up that well against more powerful opposition IMO. And we have no genuine props in reserve.
If Smith wanted that rotation to be more dynamic they'd only be able to do it in patches, and then revert to type. Is that what we saw first half vs Sts in the cup? We've seen time and again that powder puff forwards never really change, and that size alone isn't enough. Sangare is today's Chris Feather.
That's why even if Smith wanted to change tack now I'm not sure he can. He built the team to play a specific way, which isn't working (and in some cases the players aren't up to it). I don't know how much can be changed without - yet again - turning over players. But he's the coach and he seemingly wanted this squad - either way a lot of responsibility is down to him.
Again disagree that style = errors. I think people are finding any way to attribute blame to RS when we're talking like this frankly.
There is plenty to criticise about his approach but the errors are individual players lacking quality and/or concentration and discipline in key moments. We will retain the errors unless we switch out some repeat offenders.
I agree with you mostly over the analysis on the props. Holroyd needs an injury-free run and a real pre-season, but he does defend aggressively and puts himself about in the middle. Mik is fine, he's a good player. We fall off very quickly beyond those two though - Lisone is one with errors/sloppiness to his play, and Sangare doesn't run his weight.
Part of the problem though is the lightweight-ish back row. The only back rower who can bend the line is probably Smith, but I think we need another second row who is hard to handle. Personally I think McDonnell is our best grafter/dirty work player but all the other pack members should be awkward to defend against if we want more domination in centre field.
Re-signing Bentley and Donaldson (who to be fair is more here for morale than actually playing at this stage), and signing Goudemand just exacerbates the problems we have in the pack. We do have some better prospects coming through the academy but they could be a couple of years off realistically.