Re: Clarkson : Tue Aug 24, 2010 3:48 pm  

Ablett to miss out for me.

I agree with others about Clarkson and the need to keep Kirke as an interchange prop.

Anyway......posession is 9/10ths of the law so they say and the current 17 have done nothing wrong in Ablett's absence so as unfortunate as it would be for Carl and no matter how good a player he is for us i'd be disapointed if Clarkson was dropped for Ablett.

If Clarkson,Kirke and Ablett ARE all selected in the 17 then for me that would mean Diskin dropping out which would likely cause a stir on here

Re: Clarkson : Tue Aug 24, 2010 4:59 pm  

Ablett to miss out for me as well

Re: Clarkson : Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:47 pm  

cheekydiddles wrote:

Ablett to miss out for me.

I agree with others about Clarkson and the need to keep Kirke as an interchange prop.

Anyway......posession is 9/10ths of the law so they say and the current 17 have done nothing wrong in Ablett's absence so as unfortunate as it would be for Carl and no matter how good a player he is for us i'd be disapointed if Clarkson was dropped for Ablett.

If Clarkson,Kirke and Ablett ARE all selected in the 17 then for me that would mean Diskin dropping out which would likely cause a stir on here

Diskin wont miss out as McClennan plans around an interchange hooker and I do think the rest if gives Buderus is worth it.

Re: Clarkson : Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:50 pm  

darwoo11 wrote:

Diskin wont miss out as McClennan plans around an interchange hooker and I do think the rest if gives Buderus is worth it.

Especially if the Wolves tacklers target Buderus' knee which I fully expect them to do.

Re: Clarkson : Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:55 pm  

tvoc wrote:

Never drop a man in form.

Regards

Daryl Powell (2003)

Re: Clarkson : Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:56 pm  

Harrigan wrote:

Ablett has been brilliant all season and is our best 2nd row forward. Burrows not even our best 7 anymore.

Yet our results have picked up since he came back have they not?

Re: Clarkson : Tue Aug 24, 2010 7:02 pm  

BillyRhino wrote:

Clarkson's name will be the first to be pencilled in by Bluey.

No it won't.

Re: Clarkson : Tue Aug 24, 2010 7:17 pm  

In 2005 we lost because we didn't have a prop on the bench and Ward was knackered when Cooke went over.

So what is our bench this weekend against a tough Wire pack?

Re: Clarkson : Tue Aug 24, 2010 7:21 pm  

Era of the Biff wrote:

In 2005 we lost because we didn't have a prop on the bench and Ward was knackered when Cooke went over.

So what is our bench this weekend against a tough Wire pack?

Is that a vote for Kirke?

Re: Clarkson : Tue Aug 24, 2010 7:37 pm  

Old Feller wrote:

Is that a vote for Kirke?

I'm not sure