: Thu Apr 23, 2009 3:04 pm  

DISA wrote:

Another crappy Danny alias.

Why do you say that?

You're wrong by the way (must be getting used to that by now).

I'ne no idea who it is but I know its' not Danny.

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 3:06 pm  

G1 wrote:

Why do you say that?

You're wrong by the way (must be getting used to that by now).

I'ne no idea who it is but I know its' not Danny.

Yeah I forgot you were back been his butt plug for the day.

You must be right.

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 3:07 pm  

DISA wrote:

You must be right.

If I ever doubt myself I just check if I am in disagreement with you. That confirms I am right.

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:38 pm  

DISA wrote:

I wouldn't lower yourself to that level. You should know by now that there is a gaggle of self righteous know nowts who proclaim to be knoweldgeable, who will post anything that is against the majority just to get a reaction. Don't rise to it.

Why don't you follow Mclaren Fields advice and go read the guidelines. Because you will be proved wrong that's why.

While you are at it go get the facts from his previous case too.

You'll be proved wrong there as well.

Then go get your teddy off the floor and stop being so f***** precious.

darwoo11 wrote:

He doesnt have to be sent down to be a vile thug.

Didnt you once threaten a steward at Headingley?

DISA wrote:

Another crappy Danny alias.

Oh dear. You're doing a really good job of making a complete clown of yourself today.

Dont stop now.

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:16 pm  

proved wrong about the previous case? ask the lads brother who got glassed if you want the truth.
ask him about the guy who appeared next day with a bag of money if the case was dropped?

and as for someone who had his door kicked in and was given a hiding,it was the previous tenant they were after, the couple must have been terrified,as i was.

i think some of you may have a differant opinion had it happened to you or your parents

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:24 pm  

tad rhino wrote:

proved wrong about the previous case? ask the lads brother who got glassed if you want the truth.

WE can only go on how the judge read it. THe judge who is paid to asses these situations and give a lawful decision.

tad rhino wrote:

ask him about the guy who appeared next day with a bag of money if the case was dropped?

Was this mentioned in court. If so why was a case of attempting to pervert the course of justice not brought about?

tad rhino wrote:

i think some of you may have a differant opinion had it happened to you or your parents

I'd probably feel aggrieved but if its doine by the guidlines what can you do?

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:33 pm  

tad rhino wrote:

proved wrong about the previous case? ask the lads brother who got glassed if you want the truth.
ask him about the guy who appeared next day with a bag of money if the case was dropped?

and as for someone who had his door kicked in and was given a hiding,it was the previous tenant they were after, the couple must have been terrified,as i was.

i think some of you may have a differant opinion had it happened to you or your parents

To be honest Tad, I didn't think it warranted a prison sentence this time, but Pryce must surely be skating on very very thin ice.

Sorry to hear about your kicking, I didn't think your posts were that bad myself.............get yourself a rounders bat

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:36 pm  

i don't know the full facts in this case, so haven't posted on it. but i know the last case and he should have gone down.

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:37 pm  

Longun wrote:

Wonder if some self righteous posters would climb off their high horses and change their opinions if it was their good mate who was bottled in a pub?

You're of course refering to the same bloke who, instead of going straight to the police regarding the incident, went to the Bradford club and asked for hush money.

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:38 pm  

think you will find thats bollox