: Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:56 pm  

tad rhino wrote:

anyone notice when sinfield 'stole the ball' off newton smith told him him he should just have laid a hand on him to complete the tackle?

that happened in the saints game with bentham and he was ridiculed and told he was in the wrong by the RFL

I thought that too. Strange one.

: Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:57 pm  

Rhinos Fan Pam wrote:

Just as last year, Sky start to make comment about who can stop us and we get stiffed by the officials and lose enough games to put their beloved Saints on top.
Tonight with ten mins to go and four points in it, Hemmings goes on about Sheriffe's try winning it for Bradford. With so much time left and a small margin how did he know that!!?? Because it suited Sky to have us lose and no way would we be allowed to win that's how!

It stinks and Cummins is party to it and I'm sick of it!! We get shafted all the time and we need to do something about it. I can just about take losing but I cannot take being cheated to make the league more interesting

What's Francis been doing now?

Rhinos Fan Pam is ace.

: Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:59 pm  

[quote="phil webbo"][/quote]

come on here trolling when your rubbish little team have won a title. Yes leeds were poor but the refereeing beggars belief. Leeds never go through a season playing consistently well. We peak when it counts.

: Fri Apr 10, 2009 10:01 pm  

I was in a pretty good mood anyway but this thread has just rounded the night off well!
Cheers.

: Fri Apr 10, 2009 10:16 pm  

Quick, honest question here so don't shoot me down. I admit to not knowing the rulebooks inside out.

You know for something to be judged a knock on, (obviously going forward) doesn't it have to have hit the ground or the sticks? If not isn't it just a forward pass?

If not, can someone clarify the definition of a knock-on for me.

Thanks guys.

: Fri Apr 10, 2009 10:18 pm  

morpeth rhino wrote:

Who the fu(k are you?

Whoever he is he is correct with his analysis on the decisions.

: Fri Apr 10, 2009 10:20 pm  

morpeth rhino wrote:

come on here trolling when your rubbish little team have won a title. Yes leeds were poor but the refereeing beggars belief. Leeds never go through a season playing consistently well. We peak when it counts.

You are an idiot.

: Fri Apr 10, 2009 10:38 pm  

I have to agree with the decisions given against Leeds today. We were not good enough and we need to stop leaving it too late. We had 70 mins to put more points on the board and couldn't. It's hard to say because I know we are capable of so much more. Bradford kept it simple and took their chances.

*grumble*well done bulls*grumble*

: Fri Apr 10, 2009 10:58 pm  

Rhinos Fan Pam wrote:

Just as last year, Sky start to make comment about who can stop us and we get stiffed by the officials and lose enough games to put their beloved Saints on top.
Tonight with ten mins to go and four points in it, Hemmings goes on about Sheriffe's try winning it for Bradford. With so much time left and a small margin how did he know that!!?? Because it suited Sky to have us lose and no way would we be allowed to win that's how!

It stinks and Cummins is party to it and I'm sick of it!! We get shafted all the time and we need to do something about it. I can just about take losing but I cannot take being cheated to make the league more interesting

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Awwww, did your cheating team get beat, talking about cheating, the whino's were not onside ONCE tonight, and you still got beat

: Fri Apr 10, 2009 11:13 pm  

x~Gilly~x wrote:

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Awwww, did your cheating team get beat, talking about cheating, the whino's were not onside ONCE tonight, and you still got beat

Feel need to troll now do you.