: Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:30 pm  

SamIRO wrote:

High tackles?!

With Westwood in your team you have the cheek?!

Also Morley!

: Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:32 pm  

D.D. wrote:

Is there anything funnier than seeing the bitters think they have finally won a Cup Final (again) only for it to go tragically wrong over the final furlong? Hey ho, the wind and the rain!

Sig update required DD!

: Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:32 pm  

Shawy wrote:

What about Fasavalu playing the ball, when Rauhihi ripped the ball??
Knock on!!! Thought Maurie was gonna throw Ian Smith out of KR... That led to 6 points...
Gotta admit Ian Smith has gotta be one of the worse refs in SL

But i suppose Carvells 'knock on' was a knock on and not the ball being ripped out as this doesn't count through those blinkerd glasses you obviously wear. As for Gardners disallowed try the video ref was spot on as he had CLEARLY gone in touch with his right foot, not to sure about his other try as it was difficult to see, i've seen them given and not given that was a 50/50 call so in my book video ref has got that 1 right go with the attacking team. As for Highams try nothing wrong with it, if every play the ball was scrutunized then your lot would be done loads of times because they never touch it with their feet.There were numerous other calls that could have gone either way but not going to go into that.

Re: Maybe one day... : Sat Feb 14, 2009 8:49 pm  

Fishsta wrote:

We'll see a Saints-Warrington match NOT blighted by terrible refereeing, flawed video referee decisions and blatant cheating from Saints.

Warrington AGAIN deserved the win. AGAIN they were denied by all the above.

It's things like this that put people off watching what should have been a great match.

Forward passes from the play the ball, Mr Referee? What about high tackles from people NOT in shirts without the red vee?

I don't know why I'm bothering posting this. All I'll get is the usual biased Stains fans with their "LOL you bitter git" and "You don't know what you're talking about (even though you're perfectly right)" and their "U IZ RONG WE IZ DA BOMB LOL ROFLMAYO WE BEET DIRE AGEN COZ WE IZ DA BEST".

Only maybe not quite so grammatically correct.

PRAT

Re: Maybe one day... : Sat Feb 14, 2009 8:51 pm  

saint_loz wrote:

PRAT

Chomp.

: Sat Feb 14, 2009 9:47 pm  

I agree with the original poster, up until 46 minutes we did not deserve to win, but that is the difference between a good side and a great side. Good sides will only play for 40 - 50 minutes, great sides will let you and then laugh at you as they beat you.

Regarding Saints cheating, we did, we cheated the Warrington fan's and players into thinking they where going to win and then we changed the script at the last minute without telling anyone else, I think we should have the points taken of us and given to Warrington as this is clearly a breach of the rules.

But somehow I don't think that is going to happen so hear have this instead and you may want to take one of these with some of this

See you next time

: Sat Feb 14, 2009 10:13 pm  

Fishsta wrote:

Cut the accusatory stuff out. Carlos.

My apologies. But what did become of his involvement in the incident in question?

: Sat Feb 14, 2009 10:29 pm  

saintc wrote:

Cut it out. Carlos.

I saw the original message, and can offer an official translation:

"I'm so embarrassed that that thread has resurfaced because Fishsta really does make me look like a right donkey, so instead of trying to defend the indefensible as I did at the time, I'll make a childish puerile baseless comment about his wife in the hope that people's support of St Helens or hatred of Wigan will result in them forgetting what an idiot I've been made to look on so many occasions."

: Sat Feb 14, 2009 10:37 pm  

SamIRO wrote:

High tackles?!

With Westwood in your team you have the cheek?!

And Carvell.

: Sat Feb 14, 2009 11:54 pm  

Enough guys.