Re: Jack Ashworth : Sat May 04, 2013 8:31 pm  

Only 17 so definitely one for the future.

Re: Jack Ashworth : Sat May 04, 2013 8:37 pm  

St. Rughead wrote:

Only 17 so definitely one for the future.

Ah, that's better than him being 19 and not ready for the first team. Bet he's already better than Laffranchi.

Re: Jack Ashworth : Sat May 04, 2013 10:47 pm  

Saddened! wrote:

Ah, that's better than him being 19 and not ready for the first team. Bet he's already better than Laffranchi.

An inflatable sex doll would have more impact hitting the line than Laffranchi.

Re: Jack Ashworth : Sun May 05, 2013 3:52 pm  

I hope he turns out to be the real deal but I now dread the word second row and young Saints players. I can name twenty in five years but struggle to name a proper big young prop in the same period

Re: Jack Ashworth : Sun May 05, 2013 3:53 pm  

Loz wrote:

I hope he turns out to be the real deal but I now dread the word second row and young Saints players. I can name twenty in five years but struggle to name a proper big young prop in the same period

Thompson hopefully!

Re: Jack Ashworth : Sun May 05, 2013 4:00 pm  

Yes Thompson looks so far so good but he is not really a big front rower, he is more of a Jammer build and if he is half as good it will be yippee and bye bye Josh

Re: Jack Ashworth : Sun May 05, 2013 4:10 pm  

Loz wrote:

Yes Thompson looks so far so good but he is not really a big front rower, he is more of a Jammer build and if he is half as good it will be yippee and bye bye Josh

It'll be bye bye Josh no matter what, I hope!