Re: Lomax in 19 for Bulls match! : Sun Jun 09, 2013 8:07 am
No1 Saint wrote:
Even if we are forced into playing lomax at 6 we have better options at 1 than wello.
Whilst my line up would be different. I can understand that if Lomax is not FB, then Wello is number 2.
I have no doubt that Makinson is a faster paced player, but he does not organise the defense as well as Wellens. Also you take Makinson off the wing, then you weaken the wing.
If Lomax is not going to play 1, then Wellens should. I would not be talking new deal. With Walsh here next year, there should be no need for Lomax at 6 or 7.
I wonder if we can get GOB, for next year??? That would give us a 6 and 7. Then really we just need props. If we can hire him for a month, then we have cap space available?