Re: Amor Sin Bin : Wed Mar 04, 2015 6:26 pm  

bewareshadows wrote:

The burns ban is terrible.


One rule for TV games another for ones not on TV.

Amor well fair enough.

And it won,t get any better, I think in our first 8 games, 7 of them are on TV. With the tries heavily scrutunised you get the feeling we are being handicapped with this over exposure.

Re: Amor Sin Bin : Wed Mar 04, 2015 6:32 pm  

Have we appealled the Burns Ban?

Re: Amor Sin Bin : Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:20 pm  

bewareshadows wrote:

Have we appealled the Burns Ban?

Saints reported that they challenged the original charge and it was downgraded to a careless tackle (as opposed to a reckless one I presume) so Burns got one match instead of two.

I don't think Burns was banned because of the tackle. I think he was banned because he is Burns!

The Amor tackle deserved a ban.

Re: Amor Sin Bin : Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:37 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

Saints reported that they challenged the original charge and it was downgraded to a careless tackle (as opposed to a reckless one I presume) so Burns got one match instead of two.

I don't think Burns was banned because of the tackle. I think he was banned because he is Burns!

The Amor tackle deserved a ban.

No arguements there Amors was reckless and dangerous.