Re: Hull - Massive game : Fri Apr 01, 2016 10:25 pm  

vince_karalius wrote:

Kiss of death from a rovers supporter.

Useless t***s

Re: Hull - Massive game : Fri Apr 01, 2016 10:51 pm  

Out played in every dept again. Hull looked like they wanted to score of every attack and that chip over the top could of been a great try for them. We're just poor at the moment and people laughed at Radford saying he was a poor coach, they looked 10 times better coached then we do at the moment.

Re: Hull - Massive game : Sat Apr 02, 2016 12:27 am  

theblondebomber wrote:

Out played in every dept again. Hull looked like they wanted to score of every attack and that chip over the top could of been a great try for them. We're just poor at the moment and people laughed at Radford saying he was a poor coach, they looked 10 times better coached then we do at the moment.

Not being funny, I've not seen the game as I'm 1000's of miles away at the moment, but a loss by 1 point does not sound like we were outplayed. It sounds like as close as a game can get without it being a draw.

Obviously I'd prefer a Saints win and from the games I have seen we have been very hit and miss. But if they were 10 times better than us how did they only just sneak the game by 1 point?

Re: Hull - Massive game : Sat Apr 02, 2016 12:32 am  

St pete wrote:

I'm not bothering tonight (season ticket holder). I'm not enjoying going anymore. I find myself bored and wishing 80 mins Is over.

Last year and this year have been the most boring years I've seen from saints and I've been going aprox 28 years.

Try Rugby Union, you will soon be back.

Re: Hull - Massive game : Sat Apr 02, 2016 8:20 am  

bewareshadows wrote:

Not being funny, I've not seen the game as I'm 1000's of miles away at the moment, but a loss by 1 point does not sound like we were outplayed.

True words of a "Die Hard" not what mates who went said to me this morning lol

Re: Hull - Massive game : Sat Apr 02, 2016 8:43 am  

jaybs wrote: True words of a "Die Hard" not what mates who went said to me this morning lol Game of 2 halves we were much better in the first half and we actually threw the ball around more than normal, just struggled to compete in the 2nd half with all the walking wounded and poor discipline. Could have been a bigger margin of loss but we managed to stick in there. More or less agreed with KC's post match comment on this occasion for the first time this season. When you look at it, Hull playing with a bit of form not many injuries resting players ready for this game and Saints struggling for form with most of our strike players missing the result was a bit more bearable. Match stats more or less back that up. http://www.rugby-league.com/superleague ... port/12249

jaybs wrote: True words of a "Die Hard" not what mates who went said to me this morning lol Game of 2 halves we were much better in the first half and we actually threw the ball around more than normal, just struggled to compete in the 2nd half with all the walking wounded and poor discipline. Could have been a bigger margin of loss but we managed to stick in there. More or less agreed with KC's post match comment on this occasion for the first time this season. When you look at it, Hull playing with a bit of form not many injuries resting players ready for this game and Saints struggling for form with most of our strike players missing the result was a bit more bearable. Match stats more or less back that up. http://www.rugby-league.com/superleague ... port/12249

Re: Hull - Massive game : Sat Apr 02, 2016 9:13 am  

Judder Man wrote: Game of 2 halves we were much better in the first half and we actually threw the ball around more than normal, just struggled to compete in the 2nd half with all the walking wounded and poor discipline. Could have been a bigger margin of loss but we managed to stick in there. More or less agreed with KC's post match comment on this occasion for the first time this season. When you look at it, Hull playing with a bit of form not many injuries resting players ready for this game and Saints struggling for form with most of our strike players missing the result was a bit more bearable. Match stats more or less back that up. http://www.rugby-league.com/superleague ... port/12249 What those stats points to imo, is that your forwards did a pretty good job, but your backs got exposed a bit.

Judder Man wrote: Game of 2 halves we were much better in the first half and we actually threw the ball around more than normal, just struggled to compete in the 2nd half with all the walking wounded and poor discipline. Could have been a bigger margin of loss but we managed to stick in there. More or less agreed with KC's post match comment on this occasion for the first time this season. When you look at it, Hull playing with a bit of form not many injuries resting players ready for this game and Saints struggling for form with most of our strike players missing the result was a bit more bearable. Match stats more or less back that up. http://www.rugby-league.com/superleague ... port/12249 What those stats points to imo, is that your forwards did a pretty good job, but your backs got exposed a bit.

Re: Hull - Massive game : Sat Apr 02, 2016 9:27 am  

roversmad wrote:

Good luck Saints.

Re: Hull - Massive game : Sat Apr 02, 2016 9:31 am  

Mr. Zucchini Head wrote:

What those stats points to imo, is that your forwards did a pretty good job, but your backs got exposed a bit.

Spot on, we got a bit busted with Walsh, Dawson and Peyroux picking up knocks but stayed on the field. Also Wilkin make some poor options with kicks and reading defensive plays.

Re: Hull - Massive game : Sat Apr 02, 2016 11:14 am  

Judder Man wrote: Game of 2 halves we were much better in the first half and we actually threw the ball around more than normal, just struggled to compete in the 2nd half with all the walking wounded and poor discipline. Could have been a bigger margin of loss but we managed to stick in there. More or less agreed with KC's post match comment on this occasion for the first time this season. When you look at it, Hull playing with a bit of form not many injuries resting players ready for this game and Saints struggling for form with most of our strike players missing the result was a bit more bearable. Match stats more or less back that up. http://www.rugby-league.com/superleague ... port/12249 We were definitely better in the first half, but I don't remember us throwing the ball around at all. I thought we regressed back to the drive-drive-drive-kick formula. If anything I thought we threw it around more in the second half when we realised the game was going their way, but as usual we did it in such an aimless fashion it was painful to behold.

Judder Man wrote: Game of 2 halves we were much better in the first half and we actually threw the ball around more than normal, just struggled to compete in the 2nd half with all the walking wounded and poor discipline. Could have been a bigger margin of loss but we managed to stick in there. More or less agreed with KC's post match comment on this occasion for the first time this season. When you look at it, Hull playing with a bit of form not many injuries resting players ready for this game and Saints struggling for form with most of our strike players missing the result was a bit more bearable. Match stats more or less back that up. http://www.rugby-league.com/superleague ... port/12249 We were definitely better in the first half, but I don't remember us throwing the ball around at all. I thought we regressed back to the drive-drive-drive-kick formula. If anything I thought we threw it around more in the second half when we realised the game was going their way, but as usual we did it in such an aimless fashion it was painful to behold.