Enjoy your gloating... : Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:14 pm  

Yep...better side won and fair play...some one on one defence at crucial times from us was unusually poor but no qualms about the result...i think we can improve quite a bit in 2 weeks..i honestly don't know if you can improve that much so i very much fancy us to bring an end to your yearly august excursion.

p.s.

Please try and refrain from labelling Bailey as the most evil player ever to have played RL...he was far away Leeds best player and the tackle was legal!..

TIA

Re: Enjoy your gloating... : Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:18 pm  

Sneeze wrote:

Yep...better side won and fair play...some one on one defence at crucial times from us was unusually poor but no qualms about the result...i think we can improve quite a bit in 2 weeks..i honestly don't know if you can improve that much so i very much fancy us to bring an end to your yearly august excursion.

p.s.

Please try and refrain from labelling Bailey as the most evil player ever to have played RL...he was far away Leeds best player and the tackle was legal!..

TIA

you on drugs?????

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:29 pm  

Whilst watching Leeds demolish Wigan last week I found myself laughing to the Southstander chant in the tune of "she'll be coming round the mountain'" of "it's a long way back to Wigan when you're poop"

How easy was that tonight to substitute the word Wigan for Headingly?

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:30 pm  

Steven Soderbergh wrote:

Whilst watching Leeds demolish Wigan last week I found myself laughing to the Southstander chant in the tune of "she'll be coming round the mountain'" of "it's a long way back to Wigan when you're poop"

How easy was that tonight to substitute the word Wigan for Headingly?

I don't think Leeds were $hit to be honest. Saints were the better team, but most other teams in SL would have just given up to a Saints performance like that one.

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:36 pm  

Ewwenorfolk wrote:

I don't think Leeds were $hit to be honest. Saints were the better team, but most other teams in SL would have just given up to a Saints performance like that one.

You're right. Saints pressure at the line denied creativity from a usually inspired Leeds attack but humour a drunken fool who would have been there more often but for being a fool

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:37 pm  

Steven Soderbergh wrote:

You're right. Saints pressure at the line denied creativity from a usually inspired Leeds attack but humour a drunken fool who would have been there more often but for being a fool

Ok, ok.

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:45 pm  

Ewwenorfolk wrote:

I don't think Leeds were $hit to be honest. Saints were the better team, but most other teams in SL would have just given up to a Saints performance like that one.

True, but Hull KR won with key players missing...

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:50 pm  

General Zod. wrote:

True, but Hull KR won with key players missing...

Better team won on the day, just like today. Saints were up for it today, Leeds weren't expecting them to be that fired up.

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:51 pm  

General Zod. wrote:

True, but Hull KR won with key players missing...

my dads harder than your dad

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:54 pm  

Steven Soderbergh wrote:

my dads harder than your dad

Is he?

Anyway, Hull KR have got the wood on Saints this year IMO...