Laffranchi : Tue Sep 24, 2013 1:22 pm  

My understanding is that Laffranchis contract is up, but we have an option for a further year. I haven't seen any announcements, has he signed an extension? I'm taking it from there also being no announcement that he is leaving, that he will still be here next season? Professional player, who hasn't really set the world alight for us. Id sooner let him go and free up a quota spot for another more deserving player, like a S/O or centre.

Re: Laffranchi : Tue Sep 24, 2013 1:24 pm  

I agree with that, and if Wilkin is moving back to the pack then I don't see where we can fit all our back rowers in(he's never a prop that's why we've just signed up 3 more!) big wedge, better used on a quality 6

Re: Laffranchi : Tue Sep 24, 2013 3:12 pm  

I presume his contract renewal will be substantially less than his current package.

Re: Laffranchi : Tue Sep 24, 2013 3:30 pm  

He announced himself in the lounge at LP that he had his renewal sorted, but the club have not mentioned anything.
His declaration was also before the public rocket that McManus gave out and our run of terrible form. Perhaps our squad has been re-evaluated since then?

I'd get shut. We've got plenty of depth in the forwards, he's not as good in the back row as Sia, Manu, Jones or even Flash. That's even before we consider developing the likes of Thompson and Greenwood. He's proved kind of ineffective at prop, playing well when we dominate but struggling otherwise.
He's not as good a prop as Paul Clough imo and even the likes of Thompson and, dare I say it Sia would be better choices at prop.

Re: Laffranchi : Tue Sep 24, 2013 3:45 pm  

Offside Monkey wrote:

He announced himself in the lounge at LP that he had his renewal sorted, but the club have not mentioned anything.
His declaration was also before the public rocket that McManus gave out and our run of terrible form. Perhaps our squad has been re-evaluated since then?

I'd get shut. We've got plenty of depth in the forwards, he's not as good in the back row as Sia, Manu, Jones or even Flash. That's even before we consider developing the likes of Thompson and Greenwood. He's proved kind of ineffective at prop, playing well when we dominate but struggling otherwise.
He's not as good a prop as Paul Clough imo and even the likes of Thompson and, dare I say it Sia would be better choices at prop.

Totally agree. He offers no more than Clough and I imagine gets paid significantly more. I would prefer to leave an overseas spot empty in case someone comes available through the season . Even if the quota is extended I would get shut unless he is very cheap, which I can't imagine.

Re: Laffranchi : Tue Sep 24, 2013 4:00 pm  

SomersetSaint wrote:

Totally agree. He offers no more than Clough and I imagine gets paid significantly more. I would prefer to leave an overseas spot empty in case someone comes available through the season . Even if the quota is extended I would get shut unless he is very cheap, which I can't imagine.

He's lined up for a coaching role at Gold Coast when he's finished with us. Given the money sloshing about over there, if we only offer him washers, he'd be better moving home.

Re: Laffranchi : Tue Sep 24, 2013 5:37 pm  

Tony clubb would be an improvement on laffranchi in my opinion.
Clubb will be hungry to succeed In a bigger and better team.

Re: Laffranchi : Tue Sep 24, 2013 5:38 pm  

He could also fill in at centre if needed.

Re: Laffranchi : Tue Sep 24, 2013 6:47 pm  

saintcj wrote:

He could also fill in at centre if needed.

And has signed for Wigan...

Re: Laffranchi : Wed Sep 25, 2013 10:12 am  

If the non-fed quota is increasing from 5-7, as Boof has an Italian passport he would count on this and not on overseas quota. Massively underrated imo playing in an undersized pack and think he will go better next year with the likes of Masoe & Amor added (possibly moving him to back row). I think signing him again would be a decent move