Hardaker : Mon Sep 12, 2016 9:46 pm  

Assuming he doesn't make it in the NRL and cones looking for a club back here, would you have him?

Re: Hardaker : Mon Sep 12, 2016 10:56 pm  

Students around town would be sh1tt1ng themselves.

Re: Hardaker : Tue Sep 13, 2016 6:55 am  

I think every team in super league would have him if they could

Re: Hardaker : Tue Sep 13, 2016 6:56 am  

Even with the baggage?

Re: Hardaker : Tue Sep 13, 2016 7:27 am  

Harry Pinner wrote:

Even with the baggage?

Yes

Re: Hardaker : Wed Sep 14, 2016 5:58 am  

Trouble with a capital T

Re: Hardaker : Wed Sep 14, 2016 7:17 am  

infamous grouse wrote:

Trouble with a capital T

Keep well away

Re: Hardaker : Thu Sep 15, 2016 7:59 am  

Only an absolute fool would consider signing Hardaker.

Regards

King James

Re: Hardaker : Sat Sep 17, 2016 8:48 pm  

He isn't as good a fullback as Lomax and I wouldn't have him over Percival or Morgan as a first choice centre. He would be too expensive to not be a first choice player.

Re: Hardaker : Sun Sep 18, 2016 5:35 pm  

Hardaker has that x factor and can make something out of nothing and im not sure we have a player like that.

Hes a totally different fullback to Lomax. Hardaker is more of a direct devastating runner with the ball than lomax and lomax is more of a link player like a extra half.

Both of them are good defensively and decent on high kicks.

I think its just a matter of which type of fullback you want. I think Lomax is vital to our attack linking up the play on the edges and its no coincidence weve attacked better and gone on a good run since Lomax returned.