: Tue Mar 17, 2009 7:14 pm  

Lefty wrote:

It has been denied now hasn't it?

Seen that.

I guess this is how it feels to be a Wire fans against Saints.

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 7:15 pm  

Ski wrote:

Seen that.

I guess this is how it feels to be a Wire fans against Saints.

Honestly, you lot are the least of our worries at the moment.

: Wed Mar 18, 2009 6:48 pm  

A band that rebelled against old men in the music industry makes a comeback more than a decade after they did anything of note.

Is that irony?

: Wed Mar 18, 2009 7:44 pm  

Agent Mulder wrote:

[/b]


These I presume you have kept. The only things you couldn't keep were time and age.

And wouldn't we know.

: Wed Mar 18, 2009 7:52 pm  

If the Roses were some amazing live band, I'd be half-interested. Seeing as they utterly sucked live, I think I'll live without seeing them aged 50.

Faith No More, on the other hand...

: Wed Mar 18, 2009 8:13 pm  

How many times do we have to tell people?

NO DIRECT LINKS TO YOUTUBE VIDEOS...

Carlos.

: Wed Mar 18, 2009 10:34 pm  

McClennan wrote:

Completely agree. The Stone Roses were of a time and an age. All you can recreate of that is flares, kickers, hooded tops and floppy hats.

Still a class apart from the so called ahem...Indie scene now, which most young adults seem to think involves making crap rip off's of The Clash - except with pretty lyrics; having a nice shave and being definable as something that is not the X Facor (or some other device designed to race to the bottom) and hoping ypu can get your tune on a 'cool' advert in line with the hideously materialistic world at present

: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:08 pm  

Not a patch on the real Stones, The Who, Spencer Davies, Small Faces etc who could all play more than three chords, and sing in the same key that they played in.

: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:42 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

Not a patch on the real Stones, The Who, Spencer Davies, Small Faces etc who could all play more than three chords, and sing in the same key that they played in.

Those were the days -

Re: Sally Cinnamon, One Love : Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:55 pm  

Ski wrote: The Stone Roses are back. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7952409.stm ...or maybe not.... ....or maybe John Squire wants more people to visit his exhibiton.....

Ski wrote: The Stone Roses are back. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7952409.stm ...or maybe not.... ....or maybe John Squire wants more people to visit his exhibiton.....