Re: Huddersfield game : Mon Jun 03, 2013 7:33 pm  

He should be sent off there. He's gone for the head and got it.

Re: Huddersfield game : Mon Jun 03, 2013 7:38 pm  

Saddened! wrote:

He should be sent off there. He's gone for the head and got it.

The fact that he wasn't aiming to hit Gardner high doesnt normally matter to slaphead and wiggy , if it was a saints player they'd have been frothing at the mouth to get him sent off. There more bothered about how great caveman's kick was.

Re: Huddersfield game : Mon Jun 03, 2013 7:39 pm  

Saddened! wrote:

He should be sent off there. He's gone for the head and got it.

No he didn't. Gardner tripped as he ran in, just an unfortunate collision. Hope he's ok.

Re: Huddersfield game : Mon Jun 03, 2013 7:44 pm  

We're against a quality side here. Brough is the difference, it's that simple.

Re: Huddersfield game : Mon Jun 03, 2013 7:44 pm  

Saddened! wrote:

He should be sent off there. He's gone for the head and got it.

Silly post, Gardner fell.

Apart from that, has anyone else noticed that Silverwood seems to be constantly warning the Huddersfield players about all sorts of infringements, as opposed to actually penalising them?

Re: Huddersfield game : Mon Jun 03, 2013 7:44 pm  

Smiggs wrote:

No he didn't. Gardner tripped as he ran in, just an unfortunate collision. Hope he's ok.

+1

Re: Huddersfield game : Mon Jun 03, 2013 7:45 pm  

Smiggs wrote:

No he didn't. Gardner tripped as he ran in, just an unfortunate collision. Hope he's ok.

He shapes to go high, he's aiming for the head from the go there. T'ai's on O'Brien was high as well.

Re: Huddersfield game : Mon Jun 03, 2013 7:46 pm  

Saddened! wrote:

I think Percival needs a few weeks off. He' been terrible tonight in all aspects of the game. Get him back in the academy or at the feeder club and get his confidence back.

The poor lad doesn't stand a chance as his winger keeps changing.

Re: Huddersfield game : Mon Jun 03, 2013 7:48 pm  

Shambles again.

Re: Huddersfield game : Mon Jun 03, 2013 7:49 pm  

St. Rughead wrote:

Shambles again.

Isn't it.