Re: Wakefield 62-0 Wigan : Sun Apr 10, 2016 6:44 pm  

It just wasn't the Wigun way:)

Re: Wakefield 62-0 Wigan : Sun Apr 10, 2016 8:35 pm  

Couldn't put the scoreline out of there minds as well having to travel back for 62 mins on the M62-0, averaging 62mph.

Re: Wakefield 62-0 Wigan : Mon Apr 11, 2016 11:24 am  

Bet the ban button is glowing red over there...

Re: Wakefield 62-0 Wigan : Mon Apr 11, 2016 4:41 pm  

It gets better. They are so horrified at losing a game that they have to release a video explaining it. The ego on that club is something else.

Re: Wakefield 62-0 Wigan : Mon Apr 11, 2016 9:28 pm  

http://www.wiganwarriors.com/news/2016- ... s-reflects All that information and the virus wasn't given an actual name or the symptoms of the said virus and it's effects. The interviewer only used flu as an example of a virus which Rads went along with. He didn't confirm or deny it was flu.

http://www.wiganwarriors.com/news/2016- ... s-reflects All that information and the virus wasn't given an actual name or the symptoms of the said virus and it's effects. The interviewer only used flu as an example of a virus which Rads went along with. He didn't confirm or deny it was flu.

Re: Wakefield 62-0 Wigan : Tue Apr 12, 2016 7:02 am  

theblondebomber wrote:

http://www.wiganwarriors.com/news/2016-04-11-rads-reflects

All that information and the virus wasn't given an actual name or the symptoms of the said virus and it's effects. The interviewer only used flu as an example of a virus which Rads went along with. He didn't confirm or deny it was flu.

Could have been a Wanes Virus were people get physically sick and weak at the knees when given bullying demands etc. I,ve known gorilla's to get it when being imposed by the dominating male of the tribal pack.

Re: Wakefield 62-0 Wigan : Tue Apr 12, 2016 7:17 am  

Judder Man wrote:

Could have been a Wanes Virus were people get physically sick and weak at the knees when given bullying demands etc. I,ve known gorilla's to get it when being imposed by the dominating male of the tribal pack.

I also asked the below on the Wigan board

I doubt Wigan will be using NHS care and will have private medical insurance which would probs cover illness. If so many had the virus would not be irresponsible of Wigan to not at least find out the name of the virus? If they had to inform the RFL I doubt they would just accept the word virus as a reason? Wouldn't they require medical evidence so they could exercise dispensation for the salary cap? If not then that's pretty serious as every club will start the play the virus card just to increase the playing roster.

Re: Wakefield 62-0 Wigan : Tue Apr 12, 2016 7:28 am  

theblondebomber wrote:

I also asked the below on the Wigan board

I doubt Wigan will be using NHS care and will have private medical insurance which would probs cover illness. If so many had the virus would not be irresponsible of Wigan to not at least find out the name of the virus? If they had to inform the RFL I doubt they would just accept the word virus as a reason? Wouldn't they require medical evidence so they could exercise dispensation for the salary cap? If not then that's pretty serious as every club will start the play the virus card just to increase the playing roster.

Some valid points there. Just mentioned that on the Wigoon Board, so Im expecting the "ban button" to be executed this morning.

Re: Wakefield 62-0 Wigan : Tue Apr 12, 2016 9:59 am  

Judder Man wrote:

Some valid points there. Just mentioned that on the Wigoon Board, so Im expecting the "ban button" to be executed this morning.

in the interview they just keep saying Virus... the interviewer used the example of flu and Rad's just ran with it, he didn't really confirm or deny it it was flu.

Re: Wakefield 62-0 Wigan : Tue Apr 12, 2016 2:22 pm  

Some very irresponsible players all turning up to train with flu.

Surely it would have been better if they declared their health issue and stayed away from the rest of the players.