Re: Lomax : Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:44 pm  

St pete wrote:

Theo sees himself as a 6 and that's where he wants to play but lomax is fullback. Why move Theo who has possibly been our best player this year and most good things in attack comes off him.

I'm a massive lomax fan. I've virtually backed him all way from a kid, through his injury problems and imo the best ball playing fullb ack England have but a fully fit and switched on barba is a diffrent class to any fullback In super league and I don't like playing players out of position just to accommodate players. So for I think lomax goes to bench.

Yes, once Barba is match fit and hopefully Richardson/Fages is the future halves then its Smith or Lomax for the bench spot.

Re: Lomax : Mon Aug 07, 2017 10:58 am  

Barba in at full back and Lomax as a bench utility player for me. Hopefully Barba will perform and get his act together after what he has been through, but if he doesn't work out I can see Lomax back at Full back and Barba of back to Oz now his ban has been served.

Re: Lomax : Mon Aug 07, 2017 12:04 pm  

Maximus007 wrote:

Barba in at full back and Lomax as a bench utility player for me. Hopefully Barba will perform and get his act together after what he has been through, but if he doesn't work out I can see Lomax back at Full back and Barba of back to Oz now his ban has been served.

Can't see that happening. Saints have been paying his wages from when he signed on. He's under contract and unless someone pays for that contract he's still our player.

Re: Lomax : Mon Aug 07, 2017 4:54 pm  

wirefox wrote:

Can't see that happening. Saints have been paying his wages from when he signed on. He's under contract and unless someone pays for that contract he's still our player.

That's what I mean mate they will sell him to a team in Oz if he not work out and Lomax back in at full back, hope not though and he turns up and puts in the displays he has shown in the past in Oz.