Snake Plisskin wrote:
What exactly have we done better in a tenth of the time you ask? Well, given our injury ravaged team full of kids just beat your injury ravaged team full of kids, id say we may well have done a bit better recruiting strength in depth and developing youth, the latter of which was done in the championship I might add. I believe that's the point I clearly made originally. Id tell you to stop acting like spoilt children but it would only get a hilariously childish response anyway.
Don,t know how you can make this judgement based on one game and hyping it up on good youth development.
Over these last 2 seasons within success of entering superleague Widnes have been tonked at every age level including the first team losing consistenly by 50, 60 and 70 points. Massive beatings by Leeds, Warrington, Wigan and Saints again at every level.
I think you are getting carried away and getting a distorted point of view. Widnes same game last year was rubbish and got tonked by 62 points, Saints this year was rubbish and got tonked by 7 points, Similarly Widnes were rubbish against Wigan and got toked by 60 points, Wigan was rubbish and got tonked by Widnes by 2 points, similar scenarios with Warrington, Huddersfield and Leeds.
Widnes fully deserved there win on Friday night and no saints fan would say otherwise, we had a similar reaction from the wire fans when they got there first win after all those years, so we assume your reaction to the win is a similar distorted one.
- that's ridiculous tbh. You had your two first choice halves and hooker on the pitch. We had frigging Ashe/Turner in the halves and Howarth as ours. That was the difference on Friday night IMO. We weren't clinical; you were.
