: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:09 pm  

saints35 bulls0 wrote:

He came on for Cunningham originally, Roby went to hooker and he went to stand off. However, Gilmour got injured about 2 minutes later, so Wheeler had to go to centre, which left Wilkin at stand off.

Oh, didn't know that, just saw Gilmour coming off and that Wheeler had gone on

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:21 pm  

saints35 bulls0 wrote:

He came on for Cunningham originally, Roby went to hooker and he went to stand off. However, Gilmour got injured about 2 minutes later, so Wheeler had to go to centre, which left Wilkin at stand off.

What a bloody mess.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:43 pm  

saints35 bulls0 wrote:

He came on for Cunningham originally, Roby went to hooker and he went to stand off. However, Gilmour got injured about 2 minutes later, so Wheeler had to go to centre, which left Wilkin at stand off.

I'm glad you explained that because I couldn't figure what was going on there.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:57 pm  

Saint Ryan wrote:

Oh, didn't know that, just saw Gilmour coming off and that Wheeler had gone on

i will let you off

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:59 pm  

Offside Monkey wrote:

What a bloody mess.

it was - and it explains the reasoning behind us looking completely clueless at times on the last tackle. With only 1 half back, 2 hookers, no loose forward and 4 second rowers we are bound to be creatively dodgy - not to mention 2 young props on the bench.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:09 pm  

saints35 bulls0 wrote:

However, Gilmour got injured about 2 minutes later, so Wheeler had to go to centre, which left Wilkin at stand off.

Gilmour injured - NEVER!

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:17 pm  

WidnesExile wrote:

Gilmour injured - NEVER!

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:42 pm  

Offside Monkey wrote:

What a bloody mess.

It was really. With quite a few players out of position it didn't help the team's performance.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:02 pm  

He looked to me like he got caught in two minds, still the cover was coming across so it's unlikely Armstrong would have got the try IMO, he'd have run out of room.

He's young and inexperienced, just as Frodsham was last week when he got caught on the last tackle, these kind of mistakes were always going to happen and will happen in the future when we continue to give youngsters games in the 1st team.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:06 pm  

Billinge_Lump wrote:

He looked to me like he got caught in two minds, still the cover was coming across so it's unlikely Armstrong would have got the try IMO, he'd have run out of room.

He's young and inexperienced, just as Frodsham was last week when he got caught on the last tackle, these kind of mistakes were always going to happen and will happen in the future when we continue to give youngsters games in the 1st team.

yes but we still won that