Re: Adam Swift : Fri Mar 27, 2015 10:22 pm  

St pete wrote:

I was little OTT using demolished to be fair. I think we should have really hurt them down the middle considering they have more or less all the props out.

After all, it's the best pack ever to play super league isn't it ?

I definitely expected better mate I'd agree with that.

Very poor across the board tonight.

Re: Adam Swift : Fri Mar 27, 2015 10:23 pm  

Charlie Sheen wrote:

Demolished? Nah, I thought Rovers did well to stay in the game in the first half, the Saints forwards were gaining territory with ease, however, the halves and the backs looked like they couldn't create anything. Yes, Rovers were committed but Saints really were toothless in attack.

Spot on.

Re: Adam Swift : Fri Mar 27, 2015 10:25 pm  

Thing is our forwards are work manlike and gain ground (which they did constantly) we dont have a Sam Burgess etc.. who will make constantly make breaks and be a threat. Our forwards did there job imo. The backs need to go.

Re: Adam Swift : Fri Mar 27, 2015 10:26 pm  

The Yellow Giraffe wrote:

I definitely expected better mate I'd agree with that.

Very poor across the board tonight.

If Burns doesn't Fire we look poor in attack. We Defo need walsh back ASAP.

Re: Adam Swift : Fri Mar 27, 2015 10:28 pm  

St pete wrote:

After all, it's the best pack ever to play super league isn't it ?

It's not even the best pack Saints have had in SL.

Re: Adam Swift : Fri Mar 27, 2015 10:29 pm  

LFC Saint wrote:

Thing is our forwards are work manlike and gain ground (which they did constantly) we dont have a Sam Burgess etc.. who will make constantly make breaks and be a threat. Our forwards did there job imo. The backs need to go.

I agree, some of our backs ain't up to scratch and we lack a player who can beat a man and not need a pass to make a break.

The pack should have done better mate. They had virtually their whole pack out injured. We did make meters but we didn't bust them up. It was work manlike but not agressive enough in decence tonight.

We just don't have players that can make breaks and that always worries me.

Re: Adam Swift : Fri Mar 27, 2015 10:30 pm  

St pete wrote:

Our pack isn't as good as saints fans think. Some idiot on here keeps banging on how good it is yet was demolished by a make shift robins pack.

Nah, I think thats a bit OTT, we haven,t met a team who has been better than the Saints pack this season. We just couldn,t get into our A game today, our kicking options was shocking, like to see the stats on errrors, Walmsley knocked on about 4 times today. The Hull KR pack just played a steady game whilst there backs scored mostly from kick plays.

If we can keep getting 6 wins out of 7 with half the back line missing, then I,ll take it.

Re: Adam Swift : Fri Mar 27, 2015 10:31 pm  

Charlie Sheen wrote:

:lol:

It's not even the best pack Saints have had in SL.

You know I'm being sarcastic right ?

Re: Adam Swift : Fri Mar 27, 2015 10:32 pm  

Judder Man wrote:

Nah, I think thats a bit OTT, we haven,t met a team who has been better than the Saints pack this season. We just couldn,t get into our A game today, our kicking options was shocking, like to see the stats on errrors, Walmsley knocked on about 4 times today. The Hull KR pack just played a steady game whilst there backs scored mostly from kick plays.

If we can get 6 wins out of 7 with half the back line missing, then I,ll take it.

Our pack is good but by no means Is it a great pack. It's hard working but Imo nothing special.

I wouldn't be surprised if we are totally dominated next week.

Re: Adam Swift : Fri Mar 27, 2015 10:33 pm  

St pete wrote:

You know I'm being sarcastic right ?

Of course, the comment was directed at whomever is was that said Saints' pack is the best ever in SL