Re: Jamie foster : Sat Mar 17, 2012 9:12 pm  

Connor The Warrior wrote:

I hope he doesnt loose confidence because he's not the only player to be found out this year at Saints. There are quite a few that arnt good enough for a top 4 superleague side IMO.

Says the fan of a team who lost to Widnes.

Re: Jamie foster : Sat Mar 17, 2012 9:15 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

Give over. Wello was outstanding tonight. We were a one man team and he was it. If our other senior players had shown half his skill, effort, concentration, determination and everything else we would have won.

Wello was class. Without him it would have been a lot more. The other senior players need to step up instead of looking like rabbits in head lights.

Re: Jamie foster : Sat Mar 17, 2012 9:20 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

Says the fan of a team who lost to Widnes.

He's right tho.

Re: Jamie foster : Sat Mar 17, 2012 9:22 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

Says the fan of a team who lost to Widnes.

Yes. Says the fan of a top two side. Position for position you'd swap the majority of Saints for Wigans.

Charnley for Foster!!! as an example.

Re: Jamie foster : Sat Mar 17, 2012 9:38 pm  

Connor The Warrior wrote:

Yes. Says the fan of a top two side. .

At the moment.

Re: Jamie foster : Sat Mar 17, 2012 9:44 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

At the moment.

You really do post some utter tosh!! How can you argue against what everyone else see's as the facts.

Re: Jamie foster : Sat Mar 17, 2012 9:46 pm  

could have sworn hudds were top and leeds second with wigan fifth.

Re: Jamie foster : Sat Mar 17, 2012 9:50 pm  

rhino phil wrote:

could have sworn hudds were top and leeds second with wigan fifth.

Is that what the league table looks like at the moment? I confess that I've been avoiding it lately!

Re: Jamie foster : Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:18 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

Says the fan of a team who lost to Widnes.

Given the way things are going that's a bit brave, isn't it?

Re: Jamie foster : Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:20 pm  

Webbo wrote:

Well said. The kick on Whitehead wasn't malicious - the ball was there to be hacked, then Whitehead was on it. Harsh to give an additional penalty.

His misjudgement to let Pryce score was obviously the result of knowing that if he caught it on the full, he'd almost certainly be bundled into touch. The ball could have bounced anywhere (looked most likely to go touchwards), but it popped right up into Pryce's hands. Sheer bad luck.

His sin-binning was undeserved.

I have some sympathy for the guy tonight and there is an element of bad luck here, but in all 3 cases he actually made the wrong play.
- He should have been throwing his body at the ball/Whitehead, not his leg.
- He should have put his body between Pryce and the ball.
- Bizarre sin-binning, but equally he shouldn't have done it.